Tags: ACA | CBO | Doug Elmendorf | Newt Gingrich | Jonathan Gruber | Onamacare

Budget Director Should Be Fired

By
Friday, 30 Jan 2015 09:42 AM Current | Bio | Archive

Representative Tom Price, R-Ga., is by profession a physician, and a quiet and thoughtful man. For years he has led his colleagues in developing Republican policy in the House, and while he would appear to be a bit like the policy wonk, he has an ability to turn into a superman when it comes to taking strong conservative positions.

Based on recent news reports, Price appears to have the director of the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) on his mind, and not in a kindly manner. Price is not alone.

Conservatives have been increasingly irritated with the head of the CBO, whose duty is to provide non-partisan analysis of the economic impact of proposed legislation. The current director, Doug Elmendorf, has caught the attention of plenty of influential people, including the man who once represented much of Price's Georgia district, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.

In his widely read online report, Gingrich made it clear that Elmendorf, who must be reappointed this year, should not be. He's right. Elmendorf's reliance on the infamous Jonathan Gruber is Exhibit A in the case against him. Gruber is the consultant who played a heavy role in creating the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) later telling numerous groups basically how stupid the American people are, and how crafty he and his cohorts were — in creating and presenting the legislation.

The CBO was created with the belief there could actually be an independent and non-political staff of experts who could somehow tell policymakers just how much good or damage might come from the legislative efforts of politicians. While the concept seems sound, you can bet that anything created by and for politicians will indeed be political.

No one should be so naive as to believe that the CBO can be made truly apolitical. It's better simply to acknowledge how CBO analysis can be used to move along legislation that appears to reflect the ruling party in Congress. 

Well, the ruling party in Congress when Obamacare passed was the Democratic Party. They held the White House and control of both the House and the Senate. Elmendorf was their man. He chose to estimate or score Obamacare.

The CBO report on the then-proposed ACA allowed its proponents to argue that it would actually lower the deficit by more than $100 billion over a 10-year period. The CBO report was used to argue that Obamacare, if enacted, would have virtually no impact on net job loss or any other major aspect of our economy.

Of course, Director Elmendorf and his staff actually thanked the deceptive Gruber in the first page or so of their report, as Gingrich notes. Gingrich also describes how Gruber sat on the CBO's panel of health advisors at some point during the legislation's emergence into becoming law.

Of course, the same CBO led by the same director had to revise its assessment of Obamacare with regard to many of its actual results, including the likely loss of millions of jobs in the coming years. We all knew something was up when then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi suggested the bill be passed, with the reading and vetting and analysis of it coming afterward.

Now the shoe is on the other foot. Republicans rule in the House and Senate, reflecting a prevailing national dislike for the ACA. It's likely that disdain will grow as more and more employees of companies find their insurance deductibles going sky high this year, making insurance meaningless unless someone faces a really bad year of health and hospitalization.

That leads to Rep. Price and a handful of colleagues, who have a say in whether Elmendorf stays or gets the boot. Price and others advocate a process of "dynamic scoring" of the economic impact of legislation, a process that would more realistically reflect the true impact that a bill such as Obamacare would have on the economy and the nation.

Whether the process for  bills remains static or becomes dynamic really doesn't matter as much as getting rid of those who helped carry the water for this disastrous monstrosity that has become Obamacare. And that means saying goodbye to Elmendorf.

Matt Towery is author of "Paranoid Nation: The Real Story of the 2008 Fight for the Presidency." He heads the polling and political information firm InsiderAdvantage. Read more reports from Matt Towery — Click Here Now.

 


© Creators Syndicate Inc.

 
1Like our page
2Share
MattTowery
Conservatives have been increasingly irritated with the head of the CBO, whose duty is to provide non-partisan analysis of the economic impact of proposed legislation. The current director, Doug Elmendorf, has caught the attention of plenty of influential people.
ACA, CBO, Doug Elmendorf, Newt Gingrich, Jonathan Gruber, Onamacare
721
2015-42-30
Friday, 30 Jan 2015 09:42 AM
Newsmax Inc.
 

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved