Tags: clinton | deblasio | democrat

No Room for Free Speech in Democratic Dogma

Image: No Room for Free Speech in Democratic Dogma
Is New York Mayor Bill De Blasio soft on crime? (AP)

By
Tuesday, 25 Apr 2017 08:37 AM Current | Bio | Archive

The Democratic Party and the radical left elitist bosses refuse to accept that Hillary Clinton lost the election. That the Democrats lost a well-funded attempt to control the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives. They also lost state legislative seats from Florida to Washington state, which they cannot accept, especially in radical left-leaning Washington state.

This national and local refusal to accept defeat is being played out with well-funded attacks on President Trump, his Cabinet, his staff, Republican elected officials from school boards to U.S. senators, and conservative television and radio personalities.

The U.S. attorney general opined that New York City police and Mayor Bill De Blasio are soft on crime. The mayor and police chief vehemently denied the attorney general’s statement. The head of the NYPD sergeants’ union strongly agreed with the attorney general and adding the mayor’s sanctuary policy is not good.

California state Senate President Kevin de Leon claims Attorney General Sessions and the Trump administration are basing law enforcement policies on principles of “white supremacy” and not on American values. Yet, de Leon, Gov. Jerry Brown, and the Democratic legislators want to ignore federal law dealing with immigration. The California Democrats don’t value American law, it seems.

According to the San Francisco Chronicle and other Bay area news outlets, on Saturday night, April 22, 2017, a mob of 40-60 juveniles commandeered a BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) train at Oakland’s Coliseum station. The juveniles robbed passengers and injured two and then they dispersed into the night. The Police have tried to recruit the help of the Oakland Unified School District and Oakland Housing Authority officials to identify the criminals. Why? The police must have some idea who the robbers are.

CBS SF Bay Area-5KPIX-KCBS on April 24, 2017, reported BART officials admitted similar robberies on BART trains in days prior to the April 22 robbery. It appears that the San Francisco area has much underreported crime and the political officials have no desire to enforce criminal laws or immigration laws.

No investigation was reported if illegal aliens were among the robbers in the varies criminal incidents. Oakland officials are down-playing these criminal attacks on public transportation pretending there are no crime problems in the Bay area.

Illinois U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin and Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chairman Tom Perez proudly announced that the Democratic Party had no room for any person who opposed all forms of abortion on April 21and 23, 2017. These two Democratic leaders demand ideological purity on this social issue. While Perez laces many of his speeches with varies expletives and profanities.

Does Perez lack the speaking skills to articulate points without profanity? What kind of example does Perez set for the youth of America? Have Democrat politicians sunk so low that gutter speech is what they consider the “new education normal?”

Former DNC Chairman Howard Dean matched Perez and Durbin on MSNBC’s "Morning Joe" show saying the Democratic Party has no room for pro-lifers. Dean on April 20, 2017, tweeted, referring to Ann Coulter speaking at U.C. Berkeley, “It’s actually true the First Amendment doesn’t protect 'hate speech.'” Even a very few Democrats don’t agree with Dean’s comment about free speech and certainly the U.S. Supreme Court doesn’t.

In The New York Times op-ed section a piece by NYU vice-provost and professor Ulrich Baer entitled, “What Snowflakes Get Right About Free Speech,” Baer stated American speech must be qualified and censored.

Baer wrote that efforts to restrict certain speech “should be understood as an attempt to ensure the condition of free speech for a greater group of people rather than censorship.” Further, he wrote that when speech contains views that invalidate the humanity of some people, then such speech is to be restricted for a public good. He believes that there is no inherent value in debating the value of speech.

The professor does not state who should do the censorship — this is for another op-ed piece, maybe. He never said who will determine what is inhumane speech. His opinion has the ring of totalitarianism. Is this what is being taught in American universities today?

The radical fascist elitist academicians want to control America just at the Nazis did in Germany and the Communists in Russia did. But they need their “sugar daddies” like George Soros to finance street demonstrations and stomp out any dissenting speech.

There is a similarity of the radical disrupters and the street violence attacking the elected American officials to the street brawlers and thugs of Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia.
The Democratic Party cannot accept the rejection of its presidential candidate and other candidates on election day 2016. Thus, they revert to the street and disruptive tactics of Saul Alinsky, the infamous Chicago community organizer.

Alinsky’s failed ideas live on in academia, the newsmedia, and the Democratic Party.

James H. Walsh was associate general counsel with the U.S. Department of Justice Immigration and Naturalization Service from 1983 to 1994. Read more reports from James Walsh — Click Here Now.

© 2017 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

 
1Like our page
2Share
JamesWalsh
Ulrich Baer wrote that efforts to restrict certain speech “should be understood as an attempt to ensure the condition of free speech for a greater group of people rather than censorship.”
clinton, deblasio, democrat
831
2017-37-25
Tuesday, 25 Apr 2017 08:37 AM
Newsmax Inc.
 

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
© Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved