Tags: national | healthcare | costs

$829 Billion Plan Cuts Care Out of Healthcare

By E. Ralph Hostetter   |   Thursday, 08 Oct 2009 05:28 PM

What on earth could Americans learn from the combination of camels, government, and healthcare?

Ask any Bedouin, and he will answer quickly: "If the camel gets his nose in your tent, his posterior will follow."

Comparably speaking, if government gets its nose into private healthcare, a government healthcare bureaucracy will follow, including the promise: “I'm from the government and I'm here to help you.”

America is rated, overall, as having one of the greatest private healthcare systems in the world. People from many foreign nations, ranging from kings to ordinary citizens, flock to the United States for care. The late King Hussein of Jordan spent time each year at Mayo's Rochester, Minn., clinic for his annual check-up.

One of the issues that has come forth is the cost of providing private healthcare for the elderly. The last year of life is the most costly health-wise.

Today’s elderly came of age in the late 1920s, ’30s, and ’40s — and they are expected to cause a surge in elderly medical care.

Tom Brokaw of NBC News, describes those Americans in his book “The Greatest Generation” in this manner: “They came of age during the Great Depression and the Second World War and went on to build America — men and women whose every day lives of duty, honor, achievement and courage gave us the world we have today.”

It would be inconceivable even to think about a national healthcare system that would exclude or reduce benefits to any of those American patriots.

As an example of government-controlled healthcare systems, we have only to look at the national healthcare programs practiced by our neighbor to the north.

The 1984 Canada Health Act established the framework for that country's national healthcare insurance system. It outlawed most private insurance for essential healthcare and provided the vast majority of Canadian citizens with free medical services.

Canada's healthcare expense amounts to $172 billion a year. Canadians pay about 33 percent of gross domestic product in taxes, compared with 28 percent for Americans. The increased tax for Canada is mostly for free healthcare. In addition, the province of British Columbia charges residents an extra health premium of $54.

The main complaints against the national healthcare system are the delays people experience waiting for appointments, treatments, and surgeries, some amounting to four to six months, even a year.

Canadians are availing themselves of American medical services just across the border. Many of these cases reach American television audiences.

A case in point is that of Canadian citizen Shona Holmes. Shona was suffering from crushing headaches and vision problems. Her family doctor recommended she see an endocrinologist and a neurologist. It was going to take four months for one specialist and six months for the other. She couldn't wait that long and sought medical help at the Mayo Clinic in the United States.

She was diagnosed as having a brain tumor pressing on her optic chasm that needed to come out immediately. She was sent to the Mayo Clinic in Arizona, where the operation was done at a cost of $100,000. A second mortgage and borrowed money from family and friends covered the cost.

The United Kingdom is facing “serious flaws” in its nation’s healthcare program, according to BBC News Reports.

A headline reads: “Babies born in hospital corridors and lifts.”

Another report reads: “People in the U.K. face longer waits for non-emergency surgery and struggle to see GPs at out-of-hours compared to other Western countries.”

This is worse than Germany, the Netherlands, and New Zealand, and comes amid mounting criticism of the arrangements within Britain’s National Health Service.

The BBC says: “The U.K. also has the worst record of waiting times with 15 percent having to wait for more than six months for elective treatment.

“Canada was the next worst with 14 percent and the Netherlands was best with 2 percent.”

Maternity units in the U.K. are particularly hard pressed: “Thousands of babies are born in accident and emergency departments and along National Health Service corridors. Almost 4,000 women in England (in 2008) gave birth in a location other than a designated hospital labor bed.”

National healthcare has its own particular set of problems in different nations around the world. The United States does not have those problems with its private healthcare system.

The Congressional Budget Office predicted Oct. 7 that the healthcare legislation now before the U.S. Senate Finance Committee would cost U.S. taxpayers $829 billion over the next 10 years. The committee is the last of the congressional panels to consider healthcare legislation before debate begins in the House and Senate.

During the past two weeks, the Finance Committee has considered several hundred amendments to the extensive healthcare bill. Committee members increased the bill’s overall price tag by including an exemption for senior citizens from higher taxes on medical expenses.

This healthcare measure is the only proposal being considered seriously that would cost less than $1 trillion over the next 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

An old, time-tested quotation is very appropriate at this juncture: “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.”

© 2015 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

1Like our page
What on earth could Americans learn from the combination of camels, government, and healthcare?Ask any Bedouin, and he will answer quickly: "If the camel gets his nose in your tent, his posterior will follow."Comparably speaking, if government gets its nose into private...

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved