Rarely has the future been so clear. Really?? A lot of money has been lost jumping on the bandwagon. Let's do a common sense check on the greenback to gauge where risks might be lurking and where there might be profit opportunities for investors.
Nothing normal about U.S. monetary policy
During her confirmation hearings, incoming Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen testified that U.S. monetary policy is to revert toward more traditional monetary policy once the economy is back to normal. With all due respect, in our assessment, that's an oxymoron. In a "normal" economy capital is allocated according to the risk profile of the project under consideration. However, when the Fed actively distorts the price discovery mechanism with its quantitative easing (QE) programs, we believe it is impossible to move back to a normal economy.
The Fed has told the market in no uncertain terms that it is in no rush to raise rates. Outgoing Fed Chair Ben Bernanke often argued one of the biggest policy mistakes during the Great Depression was to raise rates too early. Trouble is, removing stimulus might allow deflationary forces to take over once again, negating the "progress" that's been made with cheap money. We interpret that to mean the Fed has all but promised to err on the side of inflation.
Yellen is said to favor a rules-based approach to setting policy rates. In theory, that's laudable, except that Yellen in particular appears to prefer "rules" that heavily discount inflation indicators in favor of employment indicators.
Hawkish Fed? Do pigs fly?
There is a bewildering opinion shaping that a Yellen Fed will be hawkish, especially since former Bank of Israel Governor Stanley Fischer has been nominated to become vice chair.
Already rumors are creeping up that uber-hawk Tom Hoenig will join the team. Let's get a few things straight:
• Fischer has a mixed record on the "dove-hawk" scale. After the outbreak of the financial crisis, he raised rates in Israel before any major central bank did. But he also peddled back, lowering rates again in due course. That's not being hawkish, but pragmatic. While Israel has worked hard to play in the big league of central banks, it's still a small country and policy action there might shed little light on what Fischer will do at the Fed.
More relevant to U.S. policy is that Fischer is no friend of "transparency" at any cost, having criticized the Fed for tying Fed policy to the calendar. His former student Bernanke got the message, denying on every occasion now that the course of tapering is pre-set.
• In our assessment, the real reason Yellen wants Fischer to join her is to have a statesman back her up. The hawks at the Fed have increasingly been voicing their unease. Without Fischer, their gripes might have gotten a lot of attention. Should it get uncomfortable for Yellen, she counts on Fischer to have her back, taking the punch out of hawkish rhetoric. Should Fischer disagree with Yellen, we believe he'll work things out with her behind the scenes.
• The 2013 Federal Reserve Open Market Committee (FOMC) may have been the most dovish on record. In 2014, we have two outspoken hawks voting again: Charles Plosser and Richard Fisher (hence Yellen asking Stanley Fischer to join). In recent days, there was even chatter that Tom Hoenig, who used to be a regional Fed president and outspoken hawk, would come back as a Fed governor. The background here is the current FOMC lacks community-banking experience; some community bankers have pushed for Hoenig's nomination to become a Fed governor. Unlike regional Fed presidents, however, Fed Governors are nominated by the White House and confirmed by Congress. In our assessment, it's unlikely an outspoken hawk will be nominated.
Here's what the 2014 FOMC looks like:
Let's look across the border to get a better assessment of what all this taper talk is all about. Unlike the taper rhetoric, the practice has looked a little different. Please consider the change in central bank balance sheets across the biggest central banks:
• The European Central Bank (ECB) is the only one that has not only been tapering, but also mopping up liquidity. It's not so much that the ECB wants to play the tough guy on the block, but rather the eurozone central banking is more demand driven: as banks clean up their balance sheets, they return liquidity received from the central bank. In an article in The Wall Street Journal at the beginning of the year, we received praise for our controversial call a year ago
suggesting the euro might be the rock star of 2013. It turns out the euro was indeed the best performing major currency last year.
We believe the euro will continue to benefit from risk friendly capital returning to the eurozone. Capital that continues to flee weaker emerging market countries (remember those hot emerging market local debt funds?) is flirting with both peripheral eurozone debt and equity markets. And while the ECB is not happy about the strong euro, we don't think the central bank can engineer a weaker currency. This does not suggest problems are over in the eurozone, but this year may prove once more that lackluster growth is not an impediment to a stronger currency. We have been quoted as giving a price target of 1.50 versus the dollar in 2014.
• On the chart above, the Bank of Japan (BoJ) has been the most prolific money printer over the past year. It may come as no surprise that the yen was the worst performer last year amongst major currencies. The yen has drifted sideways of late, as Prime Minister Abe's policies have lost momentum.
Unlike the past, however, we think Abe may aggressively double down, pursuing ever-more expansionary fiscal policy. Meanwhile, the BoJ has recently ramped up its rhetoric on doing what is necessary to meet its 2 percent inflation goal. We don't think it's a surprise that Japan won the bid to host the 2020 Olympics, as the infrastructure investments needed are squarely in line with Abenomics. In that context, expect higher military expenditure as well.
Our price target for the yen continues to be infinity, meaning we don't see how the yen can survive this. That's because the biggest threat facing Japan (the United States as well, by the way) is that economic growth actually materializes. Good economic data might cause bonds to sell off, making it even more difficult to finance government deficits. If so, we expect the Bank of Japan at some point to step in to lower the yield on Japanese government bonds; the valve, we expect, will be the currency.
• One reason why few analysts had predicted the euro to outperform others is because the common currency is historically often less volatile than other major currencies. But the euro had a lot of catching up to do. This year, we would not be surprised if the British pound were to outperform the euro given the tailwinds in the British economy.
We also continue to see an adjustment in expectations at the Bank of England (BoE), as Governor Mark Carney is not as aggressive as had been expected by the market. Carney has not become a hawk, but he won't need to push the accelerator for now. At some point, structural weaknesses in the United Kingdom might take the upper hand again. That's why we caution that this outperformance may only last for the first half of the year. We'll keep a close eye on developments.
On that note, if we look at a chart that compares central bank balance sheets since August 2008, we see that tapering (by the BoE in this case) means plateauing out at a high level:
While central bank balance sheets for the biggest countries have been indicative of currency moves, there are limits as to what these charts show. Notably, the Swedish central bank a few months ago, as well as the Reserve Bank of Australia just recently have shown a spike in the size of their balance sheets. These movements have less to do with monetary policy than to changes in regulations and payment systems, in part requiring higher cash reserves.
While on the topic of Australia, the formerly beloved commodity currency took a beating last year. While pessimism reigned in Australia, New Zealand was on a tear. In fact, the Reserve Bank of New Zealand is expected to raise rates a couple of times this year.
Historically, both of these currencies are highly correlated to one another. Based on fundamentals, the New Zealand dollar should do great and continue to beat the Australian dollar. However, New Zealand isn't exactly the biggest country and its currency can be notoriously volatile. So while things look good, that provides no assurance the currency will actually do well. At some point, good economic indicators coming out of China may well push up the Australian dollar and cause substantial profit taking in the New Zealand dollar.
Norway & Sweden
Throughout 2013, we became increasingly cautious about Norway. From a dovish central bank concerned about a strong currency to an increasingly populist government, we became rather disillusioned with the prospects. That, in turn, left the Swedish krona as the Nordic currency of choice. Sweden is likely to cut rates once more this year, although that action is mostly priced in. Being a smaller country, policy shifts tend to be more dynamic.
Oh Loonie! Once dovish Mark Carney left the Bank of Canada, we — like many in the markets — thought his hawkish deputy Tiff Macklem would succeed him. Not only did he not succeed him, he is calling it quits. Aside from losing hawkish intellectual leadership, the Bank of Canada has, to put it mildly, fostered a benign neglect of its currency. The key risk we see with our cautious outlook for the Loonie is that we are not alone in that view.
Emerging markets tend to be less liquid than developed markets are. Last spring showed this matters: when volatility spikes because of uncertainty over the future course at the Fed, the previously perceived free lunch in capturing yield with low volatility in emerging market local debt markets causes stomach cramps.
Not only will we likely have local disturbances with numerous elections coming up in emerging markets, but we think the heavy hand of policymakers in major economies may well persist. Most vulnerable in this context are the weaker emerging market countries — those with current account deficits.
The notably exception here is India, where Reserve Bank Governor Raghuram Rajan has introduced major reforms since taking the helm last September. While Indian reforms always suffer from implementation risk, the Indian rupee has a lot of catching up to do.
Conversely, however, even as Brazil may yet again raise rates, Brazil lacks a credible inflation fighting strategy.
China is moving ever closer toward opening up its capital account. This may well be the year where China reduces its U.S. Treasury purchases in a meaningful way and paves the way for market forces to play a greater role in setting exchange rates. In our assessment, little can stop the rise of the Chinese yuan as a major currency in the coming years. The creation of a major currency takes more than a free float, but China is fostering all the other necessary elements.
The biggest risk for 2014 may be economic growth. That's because economic growth throws a wrench into the bond market, making it ever more difficult for developed countries to finance their deficits. We believe it's very unlikely the United States could afford significantly positive real interest rates for an extended period. As indicated earlier, the Fed may have all but promised to be "behind the curve" in raising rates.
Even if the Fed wanted to raise rates, the stockpile of excess reserves accumulated from QE means they will have to rely on new tools that require them to pay increasing amounts of interest directly to financial institutions. The potential political backlash of these new rate-setting tools may make it more difficult to mop up liquidity.
Meanwhile, if economic growth and demand for loanable funds comes back, the banking system could pyramid those excess reserves into new loans that could dramatically increase the money supply and stoke inflation. The Fed may need to rely on capital adequacy ratios to contain bank balance sheet expansion, but it should be easy for banks to raise more capital in a good economic environment.
It's in this context that the future may look bright for the shiny metal. Importantly, even with the price decline in 2013, gold played its role as a diversifier.
The time to rebalance an equity portfolio is when times are good. We are not suggesting all this rebalancing should necessarily go into gold, but we are not convinced the bond market is the right place either.
As our readers may well know, we think that the currency markets may provide opportunities that offer diversification.
We manage the Merk Hard Currency Fund, the Merk Asian Currency Fund, the Merk Absolute Return Currency Fund, as well as the Merk Currency Enhanced U.S. Equity Fund.
Axel Merk, President & CIO of Merk Investments, LLC, is an expert on hard money, macro trends and international investing. He is considered an authority on currencies.
© 2015 Newsmax Finance. All rights reserved.