A senior adviser on South Asia to three U.S. presidents is now warning about "Armageddon in Islamabad."
At the request of President Barack Obama, Bruce Riedel, a former CIA expert on the region, also chaired an interagency policy review on Afghanistan and nuclear Pakistan. His latest assessment says, "A jihadist victory in Pakistan, meaning the takeover of the nation by a militant Sunni movement led by the Taliban . . . would create the greatest threat the United States has yet to face in its war on terror . . . [and] is now a real possibility in the foreseeable future."
It would bolster al-Qaida's capabilities tenfold, Riedel concludes. It would also give terrorists a nuclear capability.
Pakistan's "creation of and collusion with extremist groups has left Islamabad vulnerable to an Islamist coup," Riedel, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution's Saban Center for Middle East Policy, concludes in a lengthy study in the July/August issue of The National Interest. An Islamist coup would not be possible without the collusion of at least some army units in Rawalpindi, the garrison town 20 minutes from Islamabad. Pakistan has suffered four military coups in 60 years, living half its existence under military rule.
Beginning with the war against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in the 1980s, the Islamization of Pakistan was organized by the late military dictator Zia ul-Haq, and encouraged and funded by Saudi Arabia and the U.S. as a counter to communist ideology. This spawned thousands of single-discipline madrassas (free Koranic schools) that, in turn, spawned thousands of jihadis brainwashed to hate American, Indian, and Israeli apostates.
It also led to the creation of such nationwide terrorist groups as Lashkar-e-Toiba and Jaish-e- Mohammed under the supervision of ISI for the Kashmir front against India. Officially banned, they moved underground.
Pakistan's all-powerful Inter-Services Intelligence agency also "volunteered" some 10,000 young jihadis from the Mohmand tribal agency to fight U.S. troops in Afghanistan, but the Taliban had already collapsed and the untrained youngsters were quietly shipped back to Pakistan with denials on all sides.
After U.S. troops invaded Afghanistan on Oct. 7, 2001, ISI spread the word among tribal chiefs in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas that "Pakistan is next." A two-star ISI general "briefed" tribal chiefs after the battle of Tora Bora in December 2001 on U.S. plans "following the conquest of Afghanistan." This reporter was briefed by one of the chiefs next day. The Bush administration, the general had explained, plans to attack Pakistan in an attempt to seize its nuclear arsenal and "leave it naked to Indian aggression."
Pakistan is plagued by a dozen terrorist groups that are officially banned but seem to operate with virtual impunity. Suicide bombers have targeted every major city in Pakistan — more than once. Some 8,000 were killed in 2008. Al-Qaida's facilities, in safe havens along a 1,400-mile border with Afghanistan, are difficult to distinguish from the Taliban when bombed by U.S. drones.
The man who convinced millions of Pakistanis that Sept. 11 was a "CIA and Mossad" plot to give the U.S. a pretext to launch a war on Islam was Hamid Gul, a former ISI chief (1987-88) who has been strategic adviser to extremist politico-religious parties. Known as the "godfather" of the Taliban, he is back in the news pushing direct talks between his friend Mullah Mohammed Omar, the one-eyed Taliban chief in hiding for the past eight years with a $10 million U.S. bounty on his head, and the U.S. to negotiate an end to the Afghan war.
Gul, who had spent two weeks in Afghanistan immediately prior to Sept. 11, presumably knows where Mullah Omar can be contacted. He is believed to be near Quetta, the capital of Baluchistan, which has long been an R&R area for Taliban fighters back from Afghanistan.
As long as FATA is a privileged sanctuary for the enemy, Afghanistan is unwinnable. A spokesman for the Inter-Services Public Relations denied an interview that CNN's Michael Ware had just conducted with ISPR Director Maj. Gen. Athar Abbas, who stated the obvious: ISI still has contacts with all the clandestine groups operating against the U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan.
"A jihadist, nuclear-armed Pakistan," writes Riedel, "is a scenario we need to avoid at all costs." But, he adds, "There is good reason for pessimism. Working with the existing order in Pakistan may not succeed. But there is every reason to try, given the horrors of the alternative."
To begin with, U.S. aid levels should not be the product "of temper tantrums on Capitol Hill," says Riedel. "We should help Pakistan deal with its illiteracy rate, because literate women will fight the Taliban.
"We should provide the Pakistani army with the helicopter fleet it needs to combat insurgents in the western badlands. We should stop trying to legislate Pakistani behavior by attaching conditions to aid legislation, a tactic that has consistently failed with Pakistan in the past. Our goal should be to convince Pakistanis that the existential threat to their liberty comes not from the CIA or India, but from al-Qaida."
Across the border in Afghanistan, a surge of 4,000 U.S. Marines, 4,000 Britons and 750 Afghan troops in Helmand province came as no surprise to Taliban insurgents. As they do in any guerrilla war, insurgents fade out before a superior force.
Defense Secretary Robert Gates is under no illusions when he says that even moderate successes against the Taliban will only be seen over the next five to 10 years. Most NATO allies want out by 2011. Britain, whose troop strength, mostly in Helmand, is now increasing from 6,000 to 7,700, is under mounting pressure in both Parliament and public opinion polls to fix a timeline for withdrawal.
With eight soldiers killed in a day, it was the deadliest 24 hours for British troops since the 1982 Falkland Islands war.
© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.