Top Scientist: Global Warming 'a Lot of Eye Wash'

Monday, 06 Jul 2009 10:26 AM

By Phil Brennan

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink

Members of the House of Representatives who described the alleged effects global warming is having on the planet are spreading a lot of "eye wash," a top climate scientist says.

In an exclusive interview with Newsmax, Dr. S Fred Singer, a renowned climatologist and professor emeritus of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia, discussed the background behind the recent open letter to Congress he and six other scientists sent to members of the House and Senate.

The scientists cited a letter sent by the Woods Hole Research Center, which exhorted Congress to act quickly to avoid an alleged global disaster due to alleged global warming

Singer said the Woods Hole Center “put on a sort of scary exaggerated kind of letter to Congress ahead of the vote in the House in an obvious attempt to stampede them into voting for the Waxman Markey [cap and trade] bill."

“We thought it would be useful to write a letter that would provide a balance. The instigator of the letter was Harold Lewis, a retired professor of physics at the University of California in Santa Barbara.” Lewis, he said, provided the initial draft.

The letter was sent "to every member of Congress, through the U.S. mail, and it was also sent to a number of bloggers and others who are generally sympathetic" to the group’s point of view, according to Lewis.

Singer stated that “the earth is either always warming or cooling; one cannot tell which it is unless one specifies the time interval."

“It's like the stock market: It is rising or falling. Both depend on whether it's a week or a month or a year — it's the same with the temperature — if we start during the last ice age 15,000 years ago then the temperatures have warmed. If you start from the little ice age, which ended 200 years ago, it certainly has warmed.

“If you start from 1998, however, then it has not warmed, it has cooled. So it depends on the time interval . . . There's no question that the climate has not been warming in the last 10 years."

Reminded that there were members of Congress standing up in the debate and talking about the terrible things that are happening now as a result of global warming, Singer said, “That's all eye wash. That's not true. That's simply hype.”

“Nothing untoward is happening. The ice is not melting any faster, the sea level is not rising any faster. Hurricanes are not increasing in intensity or frequency; there's been no impact. Those things are always hard to measure. It depends on statistics. The easiest thing is to specify temperature, because it's easily measured and there is relatively little disagreement on what temperature stands for.”

He then went on to challenge former Vice President Al Gore’s assertion that the science is settled: "That is simply not true."

“When you have 31,000 scientists signing the Oregon petition saying they disagree with the current wisdom that humans are producing increased warming, it speaks for itself.

“Among climate scientists there is a split. There are those who believe in models, and those who believe in observations. And there are some who don't believe in both, and some who don't believe in any.

“The modelers believe that the models correctly describe what's going on in the atmosphere and they trust their models to predict the future. And the models all predict increased global warming. Some more, some less. There are plenty models in the world, and they all get different results. We don't know which one of them is correct, if any, or even if any of them is correct.

"Then there are those — sometimes called the skeptics , but we prefer to call them the realists — who believe in the observations, who believe that the atmosphere tells us what's going on. The models try to describe what's going on in the atmosphere, but they don't succeed.

"When the observations show that the climate has not been warming in the last 10 years, which contradicts the models, who are you going to believe? Obviously, we believe in the observations.

"When you ask the other side to debate on this issue they either won't debate; or if they do debate, they say well there must be something wrong with the observations.”

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Romney Shows Staying Power as Rivals Falter

Thursday, 10 Nov 2011 11:12 AM

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney may feel he has something in common with the late comedian Rodney Dangerfi . . .

Goodbye 2010, and a Tentative Welcome to 2011

Friday, 31 Dec 2010 19:29 PM

The year that ends at midnight was, like all years, a mixed blessing. On the good side, it was a year that saw the Repub . . .

'The Pacific' Does Marines Proud

Monday, 03 May 2010 18:51 PM

President Barack Obama reprimanded top Pentagon officials last year for pressing publicly for a troop increase in Afghan . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved