WSJ: Yucca Mountain Decision Tames Obama's Lawlessness

Wednesday, 14 Aug 2013 01:00 PM

By Dan Weil

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print   |
    A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Tuesday's court ruling in a case concerning a nuclear waste storage site properly placed restraint on President Barack Obama's penchant for ignoring laws as he sees fit, according to a Wall Street Journal editorial.

"It's good that the judiciary — a coequal branch of government, in case the administration forgot — is starting to check the White House," the Journal said in an editorial Wednesday.

The Washington, D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision was nominally about nuclear waste, Judge Brett Kavanaugh wrote in the decision. But the case "raises significant questions about the scope of the Executive's authority to disregard federal statutes," he added in his ruling.

The case concerned the proposed nuclear waste storage site at Nevada's Yucca Mountain, an Energy Department project that requires approval from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The NRC is required by law to consider the license application for the facility and to issue a decision within three years of submission.

An application was filed with the NRC in June 2008. But Obama pledged to end the Yucca project while campaigning for the presidency, and the Energy Department sought to withdraw the license application after his election, the Journal noted.

"An NRC safety board made up of administrative judges ruled unanimously that this was illegal unless Congress passed a law authorizing it," the editorial continued.

"Although Congress appropriated money to conduct the review, the NRC flat-out refused, in violation of the three-year statutory deadline."

The Journal went on to note Judge Kavanaugh's opinion that the president can object on constitutional grounds from enforcing the law until it's decided in the courts. But, the judge also pointed out, "The president may not decline to follow a statutory mandate or prohibition simply because of policy objections."

"All of this highlights that Mr. Obama is not merely redefining this or that statute as he goes but also the architecture of the U.S. political system," the Journal editorial continued.

"The professors and pundits who fret about the imperial presidency go into hibernation when the president is a Democrat, so it is crucial that the courts reject Mr. Obama's increasing contempt for constitutional limits."



© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print   |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

NY Post: Sony Pictures Proves Hollywood Is a Land of Cowards

Friday, 19 Dec 2014 16:50 PM

Freedom, you were a nice idea, but anonymous hackers with a strange fondness for North Korea don’t like you. So I guess  . . .

McConnell Slams Federal 'Bailout' of Ky. Obamacare Provider

Friday, 19 Dec 2014 16:42 PM

Incoming Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has blasted the federal government's decision to provide a secret $65 mi . . .

Obama Called Only on Female Reporters at Year-End Presser

Friday, 19 Dec 2014 16:21 PM

President Barack Obama took questions only from women reporters at his year-end press conference on Friday , eight of th . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved