Male chief financial officers at U.S. companies are paid an average of 16 percent more than their female counterparts of similar age at companies with comparable market values, according to a study.
The report by New York-based GMI Ratings, a corporate governance consulting firm, is based on an analysis of salaries of more than 1,900 CFOs at Russell 3000 Index companies with a market value of $100 million to $25 billion in 2010. About 150 of the CFOs were women.
Female CFOs received on average $1.32 million a year in total compensation, compared with $1.54 million for their male counterparts, according to a model based on the analysis. Compensation included base salary, bonuses, grant-date value of stock awards and stock option grants and retirement benefits.
The firm said its model accurately predicted a CFO’s gender. The lower the salary, the more likely the CFO would be female.
“It’s a pretty strong argument that men and women are not being treated the same,” said Tom White, director of quantitative research for GMI and co-author of the report, which will be released as soon as tomorrow.
He said he and his co-author, Kimberly Gladman, director of research and risk analytics, built the model to test whether women are paid less than men because of factors like age or experience at a company, or simply because they are female.
“We tried to turn the question around a little bit,” White said in an interview. “We thought: If men and women are truly being paid the same, then their compensation won’t have any predictive value on their gender — it should be irrelevant.”
Using the model, White and Gladman found that, even after accounting for other factors that might affect CFO pay, including market capitalization and chief executive officer pay levels, the average female CFO would earn about $215,000 more if she were male.
“To the extent that this kind of ongoing differential exists and is unexplained, it represents a failure of boards to address an important cultural issue, which is fairness,” said Eleanor Bloxham, CEO of Value Alliance Co., a board advisory firm in Westerville, Ohio.
“There is real discrimination, but nobody wants to deal with it,” Bloxham said in an interview. The people who have made it to these levels don’t necessarily want to have that conversation about their gender with the company they work for. They’re not necessarily going to raise it.’’
She said the problem may be exacerbated by a lack of women on company boards who could advocate for female executives.
The GMI study didn’t account for the possibility that female CFOs could have shorter work histories due to being more likely than men to interrupt their careers to bear and care for children, according to the report.
The study also didn’t consider the possibility that women might be more likely to move up within a single organization over time. Men may be more likely to switch employers as they move up, a factor that could lead to higher pay.
© Copyright 2016 Bloomberg News. All rights reserved.