US Judge Rules Unvaccinated Pupils May Be Barred From School

Monday, 23 Jun 2014 07:02 AM

By Elliot Jager

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
A federal judge in New York has ruled that the U.S. Constitution does not protect parents who want to send their unvaccinated children to school, The New York Times reported.

Parents cannot fall back on claims that their religious rights have been violated when their children are barred from going to school in the interest of public health, ruled Judge William Kuntz. The judge upheld a New York City policy that kept unvaccinated pupils home when another child had taken sick with vaccine-preventable chicken pox, the Times reported.

Kuntz wrote in his decision that the U.S. Supreme Court has "strongly suggested that religious objectors are not constitutionally exempt from vaccinations" based on either the First Amendment right to religious freedom or the 14th Amendment right to equal protection.

The case involved three defendants. Two families claimed outright religious exemptions while a third, a Catholic family, initially claimed a medical exemption and when that was denied, cited religious objections.

Dina Check, who first sought a medical exemption for her daughter, said she believes, "Disease is pestilence, and pestilence is from the devil. The devil is germs and disease, which is cancer and any of those things that can take you down. But if you trust in the Lord, these things cannot come near you," the Times reported.

Both New York state and New York City require children to be vaccinated in order to be enrolled in school. In unusual cases, individual schools may exempt a parent on religious or medical grounds. Schools in the state granted 3,535 religious exemptions in 2012-13.

The overall statewide immunization rate is 97 percent, the Times reported.

New York state does not permit parents to seek exemptions on the basis that they are opposed to immunization on principle or out of fear that vaccines cause autism.

The judge cited as precedent a 1905 U.S. Supreme Court case which established that public health authorities can take action to prevent disease outbreaks, including smallpox.

Between February and April of this year, two school-age children whose parents refused to vaccinate them contracted measles in New York City, according to the Times.

Related Stories:


© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Arizona Court Upholds Giving Drivers' Licenses to Illegals

Wednesday, 26 Nov 2014 07:47 AM

A federal court of appeals in Arizona has told Republican Gov. Jan Brewer that it will not reconsider a ruling that bloc . . .

Black Friday Gun Buys Test Background Check System

Wednesday, 26 Nov 2014 06:21 AM

Black Friday isn't just when shoppers rush to stores for holiday sales. It's also one of the busiest days of the year fo . . .

Judge Overturns Mississippi Same-sex Marriage Ban

Tuesday, 25 Nov 2014 21:52 PM

A federal judge has overturned Mississippi's ban on same-sex marriage, but he is putting his order on hold for two weeks . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved