Tags: supreme | court | prop | 8 | ruling

Supreme Court May Dismiss California's Prop 8 on Technicality

Image: Supreme Court May Dismiss California's Prop 8 on Technicality A man holds a rainbow flag in front of the U.S. Supreme Court on March 26 as the court heard arguments on California's Proposition 8 ban on same-sex marriage.

Sunday, 26 May 2013 10:34 PM

By Greg Richter

Share:
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
   Forward Article  |
  Copy Shortlink
Lawyers fighting to overturn California's same-sex marriage ban are telling state leaders to be ready for the U.S. Supreme Court to dismiss the case on a technicality.

What that would mean is unclear.

Voters passed Proposition 8 in November 2008, six months after a state Supreme Court ruling allowed same-sex marriages, the Los Angeles Times reported Sunday. The amendment to the state constitution defined marriage as being between a man and a woman, effectively outlawing gay weddings, which had had been taking place in the state for six months.

All weddings that had already taken place remain legal.

Lawyers sued to overturn the law on behalf of two couples, one in Los Angeles County and one in Alameda County. San Francisco County District Judge Vaughn R. Walker ruled the law unconstitutional in 2010, but the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals stayed Walker's order, saying that since the suit was not brought as a class action, the ruling applied only to the two couples or to the two counties in which they reside.

It is unclear to legal experts what it will mean if the Supreme Court dismisses the case. Some think it will revert to the 9th Circuit, which could lift the hold on Walker's order.

In case that happens, same-sex advocates are lobbying Gov. Jerry Brown and Attorney General Kamala D. Harris to go forward and assume the law applies statewide. Both Brown and Harris support same-sex marriage.

The Supreme Court could also rule that Protect Marriage, which sponsored Prop 8 and has been the defendant in court has no standing, The Times reported. If that were the case, a county clerk who opposes gay marriage might have to step in as a surrogate. The clerk would be charged with showing standing as well.

"One would hope our opponents would say it is time to stop this fight and move on to something else," Theodore J. Boutrous, a lawyer for Prop 8's challengers said.


© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
   Forward Article  |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Peter King, Press Corps Irked Over White House Boston Observance

Tuesday, 15 Apr 2014 22:16 PM

The White House press corps was unhappy that it was not allowed access to a moment of silence for Boston Marathon victim . . .

Arizona State Rep: 'Can't Recognize My Country' in Rancher Dispute

Tuesday, 15 Apr 2014 18:47 PM

Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy may have been partly to blame for his standoff with federal authorities, but the government' . . .

Bill Allows Snap Inspections of Arizona Abortion Clinics

Tuesday, 15 Apr 2014 20:58 PM

Arizona Governor Jan Brewer on Tuesday signed into a law a bill allowing state health authorities to conduct surprise in . . .

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved