Tags: states | stiffing | cities

Mayors Blasting Governors For Denying Stimulus Funds

Monday, 11 May 2009 11:56 AM

By Dan Weil

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink

Big cities complain that their statehouses are neglecting them when it comes to doling out money from February’s $787 billion fiscal stimulus package.

About $280 billion of that windfall goes to state and local governments. But many major metropolis mayors say states are underfunding them while doling out more generous sums to politically powerful suburbs.

And some state governments, as they pass along money from the feds, are cutting their own allocations to cities.

Years ago plenty of federal money went directly to cities, but not anymore. Direct federal allocations as a portion of city budgets have dropped to as low as 5 percent from as high as 20 percent in the 1970s, Hal Wolman, director of the George Washington Institute of Public Policy in Washington, tells The Wall Street Journal.

Governors, of course, dispute the mayors’ claims. They say they are trying to distribute federal money equitably among cities, and that in some cases they are constrained by Congressional rules or their own state laws.

Charlotte, N.C., Republican Mayor Pat McCrory has complained to the state’s Democratic Gov. Bev Purdue that his city is getting shortchanged. Charlotte officials sought about $220 million this year to finish a highway to serve the city.

But they were only able to garner about $4 million from the stimulus package for their project. And at the same time, the state decided to keep almost $4 million which it originally planned to give Charlotte for highway spending.

McCrory argues that states dole out federal money to cities “by politics and not by need.”

North Carolina officials deny they are stiffing Charlotte, pointing out that the region including the city received $100 million of the $735 million the feds provided the state for road work.

But across the country, big cities are at a disadvantage Wolman says. “If you use state legislatures to distribute federal money, the suburbs are going to do better than cities,” he tells The Journal. Suburbs "have grown enormously, and in political strength, and cities have not."

A bigger issue than how federal money is divided between cities may be whether their states accept all the federal money in the first place.

In Texas, Louisiana, South Carolina and Alabama, for example, Republican governors have fought to refrain from taking federal money to boost unemployment compensation.

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Pennsylvania Becomes 27th State to Expand Medicaid

Thursday, 28 Aug 2014 21:34 PM

A half-million more low-income Pennsylvanians are in line to get federally funded health insurance after the U.S. Depart . . .

Joan Rivers in Medically Induced Coma After Cardiac Arrest: Report

Thursday, 28 Aug 2014 19:45 PM

Comic Joan Rivers was hospitalized in critical condition Thursday morning after she reportedly went into cardiac arrest  . . .

Another Flight Diverts in Reclined-Seat Flap

Thursday, 28 Aug 2014 19:21 PM

An outburst over a reclined seat led an American Airlines flight to divert to Boston, at least the second such incident  . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved