Tags: scotus | secret | service | free | speech

SCOTUS to Review Free-Speech Case Against Secret Service

Tuesday, 26 Nov 2013 12:19 PM

 

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
The Supreme Court will consider whether Secret Service agents can be sued for keeping protesters blocks away from the president during public appearances in a case testing the balance between security and speech rights.

The court today agreed to hear an appeal by President Barack Obama’s administration in a dispute over demonstrations against his predecessor, George W. Bush.

Seven Bush critics say the Secret Service showed favoritism toward the former president’s supporters during his October 2004 campaign stop in Jacksonville, Oregon. The seven people say that, unlike pro-Bush demonstrators, they were forced to move two blocks from the hotel where the president was dining. A federal appeals court let their claims against two agents go forward.

The Obama administration says the Secret Service shouldn’t have to worry about ensuring that groups with different viewpoints have comparable proximity to the president.

The lower court ruling "poses particularly great threats to the Secret Service’s work," U.S. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli argued in court papers.

"In protecting the physical safety of high-ranking public officials, Secret Service agents must often make spur-of-the- moment judgments in circumstances where the cost of a mistake may be very high," Verrilli said.

The lawsuit, pressed by the American Civil Liberties Union, says the Oregon incident was one of 13 in which the Secret Service kept protesters away from Bush.

The agents' actions "reflected a decision to shield the president from respondents' unwelcome message while he was dining, rather than any legitimate security concern," the protesters argued in court papers.

The high court ruled in 2012 that two Secret Service agents couldn’t be sued by a man who was arrested after confronting then-Vice President Dick Cheney. The justices took a narrow approach in the case, saying Secret Service agents were immune from the suit without deciding whether the man’s First Amendment rights were violated.


© Copyright 2014 Bloomberg News. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Yellen's Tough Job: Determining When Labor Market Has Healed

Friday, 22 Aug 2014 23:49 PM

Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen said she still isn't satisfied with the U.S. labor market. . . .

California Senate Passes Gun Database Checks Bill

Friday, 22 Aug 2014 22:46 PM

The California Senate passed a bill on Friday requiring local law enforcement to search a database of firearms owners in . . .

Parole for John Lennon's Killer Mark David Chapman Denied Again

Friday, 22 Aug 2014 22:19 PM

John Lennon's killer was denied release from prison in his eighth appearance before a parole board, correction officials . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved