Tags: pelosi | women | health | care

Pelosi's 'Assault on Women' Comments Opportunistic

Thursday, 03 May 2012 09:37 AM

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Nancy Pelosi’s recent comments that the GOP was going to “make another assault” on women’s health “smacks of political opportunism,” The Washington Post concluded in a fact check of the statement.

Pelosi, D-Calif., made the comment during a debate on how to fund subsidized college loans. The House GOP voted to pay for it by cutting the Prevention and Public Health Fund in Obamacare. Pelosi assailed the move.

“In order to pay for it, [House Republicans] are going to make an assault on women’s health, make another assault on women’s health, continue [their] assault on women’s health, and pay for this with prevention initiatives that are in effect right now for childhood immunization; for screening for breast cancer, for cervical cancer; and for initiatives to reduce birth defects — a large part of what the Centers for Disease Control does in terms of prevention.”

However, looking at the fund, the Post noted in the “current fiscal year, there is very little money specifically allocated to women’s health programs.”

“Pelosi mentioned childhood immunization, and that’s there, but that’s more for children than women,” the Post reported. “But cervical cancer, breast cancer, birth defects — nope, unless you label programs on obesity and tobacco as preventing birth defects.”

The president’s budget for fiscal 2013 does propose moving $260 billion in funding for cervical and breast cancer prevention into the fund. “However, we think an ordinary person would think Pelosi’s remarks made it seem as if the funding proposed for 2013 is actually happening right now,” the Post said.

The Post concluded that “this is a good example of politicians using obscure details of the budgetary process to score political points.”

“Pelosi could have raised concerns about perceived cuts in preventive health. She could have also noted that women benefit greatly from such efforts. But she — and fellow Democrats — went too far to label this ‘an assault on women’s health.’ Maybe evidence of that will emerge through the regular appropriations process — at which point we could revisit this ruling — but for the moment this smacks of political opportunism,” the Post wrote in awarding the statement two Pinocchios.

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Expert: 'Unusual' That Ebola Medical Staff Is Not Quarantined

Thursday, 23 Oct 2014 22:43 PM

Infectious disease expert Dr. Robert Lahita says he is surprised medical personnel who have worked directly with Ebola p . . .

Rep. Charlie Rangel: ISIS Is Not a National Security Threat

Thursday, 23 Oct 2014 22:34 PM

Rep. Charlie Rangel doesn't see a need or a reason for the U.S. to use military force against the Islamic State (ISIS),  . . .

Ex-Gov Turned Cannabis CEO: Pot Legal Across US by 2024

Thursday, 23 Oct 2014 22:25 PM

Former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson, who runs a publicly traded marijuana products company called Cannabis Sativa, Inc.  . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved