Palin: Surrendering Internet Control 'Colossal Error'

Image: Palin: Surrendering Internet Control 'Colossal Error'

Thursday, 20 Mar 2014 07:01 AM

By Elliot Jager

  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
The Obama administration's decision to turn over responsibility for Internet domain names to the international community was denounced by former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as a "colossal foreign policy error,"  Politico reported.

The U.S. has administered the database of domain names and addresses since the late 1990s through the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. The administration has now tasked ICANN to come up with a plan for the shift.

Urgent: Who Should Be 2016 GOP Presidential Nominee?

In a Facebook post, Palin said the decision was likely to have "long term negative repercussions for freedom." The administration was handing "a gift to authoritarian regimes who seek to stifle the freedom the Internet gives to voices around the world fighting for basic human rights."

Palin concluded her post: "No amount of Obama/liberal media spin can justify this."

Business Insider reported that China and Russia have been pushing for a more decentralized system for domain names and, possibly, for the U.N. to play a greater role.

The Commerce Department said it does not want the U.N. to take over and implied that the U.S. would not abdicate responsibility until a satisfactory system was in place, The Wall Street Journal reported.

The move is meant to restore confidence in U.S. firms providing cloud and other Internet services in the wake of the Edward Snowden affair, and reassure other countries that Washington is not out to dominate the Internet, the Journal reported.

Proponents say countries can block their citizens from easily accessing certain domain names, and that the private sector will have a positive influence on whatever new domain regime comes into play. Skeptics argue decentralization could lead to copyright infringements with sovereign countries using identical domain names, according to Business Insider.

"Make no mistake, this is a concession by the U.S.," wrote Gautham Nagesh of The Wall Street Journal. "While the Commerce Department rarely intervened publicly in ICANN's affairs, the implicit threat of its ability to do so will be gone. That could have an unforeseen impact in the future, particularly if cyber-weapons continue to play a larger role in military and counter-intelligence activities."

Urgent: Who Should Be 2016 GOP Presidential Nominee?

Related Stories

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Florida Man Convicted of Killing Unarmed Teen Over Loud Music

Wednesday, 01 Oct 2014 21:22 PM

A Florida jury found Michael Dunn, a middle-aged white man, guilty of first-degree murder on Wednesday in the shooting d . . .

NY Post Settles Boston Marathon Bombing Lawsuit

Wednesday, 01 Oct 2014 22:23 PM

The New York Post has reached a settlement in a Boston Marathon bombing defamation suit.
 . . .

Dick Morris: Obama Went Out of Way to Miss Intelligence Briefings

Wednesday, 01 Oct 2014 11:15 AM

President Barack Obama has missed 58 percent of the national security intelligence briefings during each of his terms in . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved