Becket Fund: Obama Offers False Compromise

Friday, 10 Feb 2012 01:41 PM

By Marti Lotman

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, in a press release following President Barack Obama’s backpedaling on his stance on the abortion-drug mandate, said that the Commander in Chief has only offered a false “compromise,” and that many religious organizations are still going to be forced to violate their religious ideologies.

“This is a false ‘compromise’ designed to protect the President’s re-election chances, not to protect the right of conscience,” Hannah Smith, Senior Legal Counsel for The Becket Fund said.

“Hundreds, if not thousands, of religious institutions are still left out in the cold and will be forced to violate their religious convictions,” Smith lamented.

Smith refers to a White House statement earlier today that announced some religious employers will no longer be coerced into providing insurance coverage for contraception, sterilization, and abortifacient drugs.

However, coverage for all three will be provided, for free, by insurance companies.

According to Smith, this raises a trifecta of problems.

First, many religious organizations self-insure, which means that they will still be paying for services that they believe stand in stark opposition to their religious beliefs.

The second quandary is that the President has made it intentionally nebulous as to which religious organizations are exempt under the new rule and whether it will extend to for-profit organizations, individuals, or non-denominational organizations.

Lastly, Smith notes, money is considered fungible, and religious organizations may object to the idea of being forced to pay money to an insurance company that may, in turn, provide contraception to its employees free of charge.

“It is especially telling that the details of this supposed ‘compromise’ will likely not be announced until after the election. Religious freedom is not a political football to be kicked around in an election-year. Rather than providing full protection for the right of conscience, the administration has made a cynical political play that is the antithesis of ‘hope and change.’”


© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Economy Is Winning Midterms for Republican Party: Albert Hunt

Wednesday, 20 Aug 2014 11:34 AM

Republicans have grown even more confident about the midterm elections, convinced that the economy, where the actual dat . . .

WSJ: Many Americans Can't Shake Arrest Record

Wednesday, 20 Aug 2014 07:28 AM

Practically a third of Americans have an arrest record, even if no charges were brought, which can create problems when  . . .

Rep. Paul Ryan: US Must 'Re-engage' on Welfare Reform

Wednesday, 20 Aug 2014 09:28 AM

U.S. lawmakers need to re-engage with the poor and develop welfare reforms to help lift people out of poverty, Rep. Pa . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved