GOP Leaders Charge DOJ With ‘Quid Pro Quo’ in Minn. Housing Case

Thursday, 27 Sep 2012 03:39 PM

By Todd Beamon

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Four Congressional Republican leaders have charged that the U.S. Justice Department brokered an “unprecedented” deal with Minnesota’s capital city last year, agreeing not to join two housing-related lawsuits against St. Paul as long as the city pulled out of a U.S. Supreme Court case.

The city was lobbied by former Democratic Vice President Walter Mondale, the NAACP, the AFL-CIO and many others over the court case, worried that a legal victory would gut protections for minorities in the Fair Housing Act and other civil rights legislation, TwinCities.com reports.

In a letter on Monday to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif.; Senate Judiciary Ranking Member Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa; House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith, R-Texas, and House Oversight Financial Services Subcommittee Chairman Patrick McHenry, R-NC, questioned the Justice Department’s role in St. Paul’s decision.

The GOP leaders charged that Assistant U.S. Attorney General Tom Perez, over the objections of staff lawyers, "enticed the city to drop its lawsuit that Mr. Perez did not want decided by the Supreme Court," TwinCities.com reports.

"One of the features of this quid pro quo, distinguishing it from a standard settlement or plea deal, was that it obstructed rather than furthered the ends of justice," they wrote.

They're asking four attorneys from Holder's office to submit to interviews by Friday. They include former U.S. attorney for Minnesota, B. Todd Jones, who is now the acting director of the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. The others are Perez, Tony West and Chad Blumenfield.

The Justice Department has yet to respond in writing to the request.

In the lawsuit, Magner vs. Gallagher, a dozen St. Paul landlords argued that the city's extensive efforts to inspect and condemn their properties — "code to the max" philosophy — decreased the amount of affordable housing available to minorities, a violation of, or "disparate impact" under, the federal Fair Housing Act.

The city argued otherwise, and many civil rights advocates worried that the city would have won the argument, inadvertently creating huge exceptions to the act and other civil rights legislation, TwinCities.com reports.


© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

White House Intruder Pleads Not Guilty

Wednesday, 01 Oct 2014 16:27 PM

A knife-carrying U.S. Army veteran who jumped a fence and ran into the White House, triggering a ferocious debate about  . . .

GMO Products Remain Source of Controversy, Heated Debate

Wednesday, 01 Oct 2014 15:39 PM

On Sept. 17, the Department of Agriculture granted an OK to use genetically modified corn and soybean seeds that are res . . .

Attorney Puzzled by Secrecy in Ore. Ex-Marine Sniper Case

Wednesday, 01 Oct 2014 15:17 PM

Criminal defense attorney Mark O'Mara says he is mystified by a Oregon court's secrecy surrounding the case of a former  . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved