Tags: maxine | waters | ethics | panel

Ethics Panel: No Action Against Democrat Maxine Waters

Friday, 21 Sep 2012 12:37 PM

 

Share:
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
   Forward Article  |
  Copy Shortlink

The House Ethics Committee’s outside counsel recommended no further investigation of allegations that California Democrat Maxine Waters helped a struggling bank in which her husband held stock obtain a government bailout in 2008.

“The evidence in the record does not support a knowing violation of the ethics rules or any other standard of conduct” by Waters, Billy Martin, a Washington lawyer hired by the panel, told the committee at a public hearing.

Martin presented conclusions of his investigation to the panel, which met as Congress prepared to leave Washington until after the Nov. 6 election.

Martin’s “review is now complete” and the panel is “prepared to accept” his recommendation pending the outcome of the hearing, Virginia Republican Bob Goodlatte, the committee’s acting chairman, said in an opening statement. The panel made no announcement of any decision after a closed-door session.

In 2010, the committee began its investigation into allegations that Waters had brought discredit to the House by helping OneUnited Bank of Boston obtain $12 million from the Troubled Asset Relief Program.

The charges against Waters weren’t revived after the newly elected Congress took office in 2011. Martin was initially hired to review alleged misconduct by ethics panel staff lawyers, who have since moved to other jobs. He then examined evidence against Waters and her chief of staff, Mikael Moore, to determine whether to reopen the investigation.

At today’s hearing, Martin told the panel there was insufficient evidence regarding Waters or Moore. Martin said there wasn’t “clear and convincing” evidence that Moore, who is Waters’s grandson, knowingly violated House rules by helping OneUnited get the government bailout.

Still, Martin said investigators are “troubled” by inconsistencies in Moore’s testimony that raise “substantial issues of credibility.” He recommended that the panel consider whether “it was appropriate” to make a move against Mr. Moore short of formal action. That could take the form of a letter of reproval from the panel’s chairman and top Democrat.

Martin said he couldn’t “conclusively determine” whether Moore sent e-mails to help OneUnited get government assistance before or after Waters told him not to assist the bank.

Waters should be exonerated of wrongdoing because evidence shows that she “took the important step” of instructing Moore “not to specifically assist OneUnited,” Martin said. The investigation found that there is no “clear and convincing” evidence that she “failed to supervise her staff,” he said.

Martin also reviewed evidence that Waters had called then- Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to request a meeting on behalf of minority banks that were hurt by the government takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The evidence showed that when Waters called Paulson, “she believed she was acting on behalf of all minority banks” in the National Bankers Association, a Washington-based trade group, and not only OneUnited, Martin said.

Paulson didn’t attend the Sept. 9, 2008, meeting between Treasury officials and two OneUnited executives, according to committee documents.

OneUnited had sought government assistance in September 2008 because it held “substantial investments” in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, according to the committee’s 2010 statement of alleged violations by Waters. Without a government financial bailout, OneUnited stock owned by Waters’s husband, Sidney Williams, would have been worthless, the committee alleged.

The shares were worth almost $352,000 in June 2008 and their value dropped to $175,000 four months later, after federal regulators had placed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in a conservatorship, the committee said. OneUnited received $12 million from TARP, plus $17 million in private investment.

The two-year investigation was delayed by allegations that two former staff lawyers had improperly leaked information about the Waters case to Republican lawmakers. Martin concluded that none of the panel’s members was biased by the leaks. Still, House Speaker John Boehner, an Ohio Republican, appointed six acting members to oversee the Waters inquiry.

 


© Copyright 2014 Bloomberg News. All rights reserved.

Share:
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
   Forward Article  |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Generic Drug Shortage Fueled by Government Actions, Critics Say

Wednesday, 16 Apr 2014 16:49 PM

A proposed Food and Drug Administration rule on product labeling will exacerbate shortages of generic drugs already resu . . .

Bitter Court Feud Erupts Over Sweet Vidalia Onions

Wednesday, 16 Apr 2014 16:40 PM

No Vidalia onion will be harvested before its time. So says the agricultural commissioner who claims farmers should face . . .

Va. GOP Can't See End to Medicaid Standoff, Fears Loss of Bond Rating

Wednesday, 16 Apr 2014 15:17 PM

If leading Virginia Republicans are right, the battle over Medicaid expansion could leave the state wounded. Virginia Ho . . .

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved