Tags: gps | tracking | search | warrant

Government Prosecutors Argue for GPS Tracking

Friday, 01 Jun 2012 10:56 AM

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Prosecutors with the U.S. Justice Department argued Thursday that the government is permitted to place Global Positioning System tracking devices on vehicles without the prior receipt of a search warrant, an argument that seems to contravene a January Supreme Court ruling that the installation of a GPS device without a warrant is a violation of the U.S. constitution’s prohibition of “unreasonable searches and seizures.”

According to the Wall Street Journal, Government prosecutors arguing their case before the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals “relied on the fact that the high court didn’t specifically state that a search warrant would be required in other situations.”

In U.S. v. Jones, the court’s majority ruled that warrantless GPS tracking device installation constituted a trespass onto an individual’s property. But the high court did not adjudicate another government argument, which held that GPS tracking is a reasonable search that could be accomplished by other means — physically following a suspect’s car, for example — and therefore did not require a warrant.
If the distinction strikes you as a tenuous one, you are not alone. One legal scholar described the government’s argument as a violation of “the spirit, if not the letter, of the Jones decision.”

Other legal analysts, however, have identified several situations in which a search may be conducted without a warrant, including searches at border crossings and in public schools, and speculated that the government could credibly present GPS tracking as another reasonable exception to the search-warrant requirement.

In its argument to the Ninth Circuit, the government argued that “requiring a warrant and probable cause would seriously impede the government’s ability to investigate drug trafficking, terrorism, and other crimes.”

To some, that’s a risk worth taking. In an amicus brief filed at the Ninth Circuit, the American Civil Liberties Union warned, “Without a warrant requirement, the low cost of GPS tracking and data storage would permit the police to continuously track every driver.”

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Expert: 'Unusual' That Ebola Medical Staff Is Not Quarantined

Thursday, 23 Oct 2014 22:43 PM

Infectious disease expert Dr. Robert Lahita says he is surprised medical personnel who have worked directly with Ebola p . . .

Rep. Charlie Rangel: ISIS Is Not a National Security Threat

Thursday, 23 Oct 2014 22:34 PM

Rep. Charlie Rangel doesn't see a need or a reason for the U.S. to use military force against the Islamic State (ISIS),  . . .

Ex-Gov Turned Cannabis CEO: Pot Legal Across US by 2024

Thursday, 23 Oct 2014 22:25 PM

Former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson, who runs a publicly traded marijuana products company called Cannabis Sativa, Inc.  . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved