Gay-Conversion Backers Bid to Take Ban to Supreme Court

Thursday, 06 Feb 2014 03:53 PM

 

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Counselors and patients opposed to California’s ban on gay-conversion therapy, which was upheld by a federal appeals court, asked the U.S. Supreme Court to decide whether the statute violates parental and free-speech rights.

In a petition filed today in Washington, lawyers for counselors and patients said the nation’s highest court should decide whether the law is constitutional. They maintain it censors their discussions and interferes with parents' care for their children.

"Unless this court grants the petition and overturns the lower courts, government will have a new and powerful tool to silence expression based on a political or moral judgment about the content and purpose of the communications' despite the First Amendment's explicit prohibition against such governmental punishment," Mathew Staver, a lawyer for counselors, said in an e-mailed statement.

The appeals court in San Francisco in August upheld the law, which bars doctors, psychologists, family therapists and social workers from providing sexual-orientation conversion therapy to patients under 18. Violators are subject to discipline by state licensing bodies.

The appeals court's ruling is on hold pending the Supreme Court’s decision. A similar law in New Jersey is being challenged.

 

A three-judge panel of the appeals court said state lawmakers acted reasonably in limiting a treatment that health groups found to be harmful to minors.

Protecting the well-being of children is a legitimate state interest, and the law "does not violate the free speech rights of practitioners or minor patients, is neither vague nor overbroad, and does not violate parents' fundamental rights," the court said.

The law doesn't bar unlicensed providers, such as religious leaders, from administering the therapy or prevent licensed providers from referring minors to religious leaders to get it, according to the ruling. A larger panel of the court refused to reconsider the decision, with three judges dissenting.

Nick Pacilio, a spokesman for California Attorney General Kamala Harris, declined to comment on the petition.
 

 

© Copyright 2014 Bloomberg News. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

To Fight Crime, Chicago Tries Wiping Away Arrests

Tuesday, 22 Jul 2014 14:58 PM

Desperate to curb the gun violence wracking their city, Chicago lawmakers are leading the way toward a counterintuitive  . . .

Mysterious White Flags Appear Atop Brooklyn Bridge

Tuesday, 22 Jul 2014 13:40 PM

Someone has replaced two American flags on the Brooklyn Bridge with mysterious white flags.The white flags - internation . . .

Pew: Young Liberals Losing Faith in Government and God

Tuesday, 22 Jul 2014 12:06 PM

Today's millennials lean left but distrust government, marking a political opportunity to cull their support, which is m . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved