Farmers Make Millions From Bloated Crop Insurance Scheme

Image: Farmers Make Millions From Bloated Crop Insurance Scheme

Thursday, 02 May 2013 02:33 PM

By Lisa Barron

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
A new study finds that a heavily subsidized federal crop insurance program has become overly bloated at the expense of taxpayers.

The study, commissioned by the non-profit Environmental Working Group and conducted by Iowa State University agriculture economist Bruce Babcock, comes just as Congress prepares to take up the next farm bill.

It shows that crop insurance has become less of a safety net for farmers facing disasters like the drought of 2012 and more like an income support system.

That’s because under the program, most farmers buy a combination of policies that cover poor crop yields and declines in revenue. But the premiums paid by farmers cover only 40 percent of the anticipated payouts, according to Babcock, while taxpayers foot the bill for the other 60 percent.

Because the program is so heavily subsidized, farmers buy more coverage than they would otherwise, while taxpayers bear an inordinate share of any losses.

After the 2012 drought, the worst in 50 years, crop insurance payouts reached a record high, said Babcock. Indemnities for the year will exceed $16 billion, an increase of almost 50 percent from the then-record $10.8 billion paid out the year before.

Without those subsidies, he said, corn and soybean crop insurance payouts, for example, would have been just over $6 billion in 2012 — less than half of the actual amounts.

In many cases, notes Babcock, the program "allows growers to make more money from insurance payouts than they would from a healthy harvest."

The EWG concludes in its release on Wednesday that the latest report "adds to the growing evidence that common sense reforms to crop insurance would save billions of dollars while still providing a solid safety net, cutting the deficit and investing in programs that improve human health and the environment."

It suggests that if either of last year’s failed Senate or House Agriculture Committee farm bill proposals expanding the crop insurance program by eliminating direct payments to farmers regardless of whether they grow crops had passed, taxpayers would be asked to pay even more.

"Congress should and could do far better as it takes up the farm bill again this year," it said.






© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Judge Blocks Obamacare Tax Rule for Non-Exchange States

Tuesday, 30 Sep 2014 19:15 PM

An Oklahoma federal judge dealt a blow to President Barack Obama's health-care law, invalidating IRS rules aimed at maki . . .

Comments on Mrs. Obama's Speech Off Limits, Reporters Told

Tuesday, 30 Sep 2014 19:07 PM

A creeped out Wisconsin journalist complains she was told by aides of Democratic Wisconsin gubernatorial candidate Mar . . .

Refugee Plan Set up for Central American Minors

Tuesday, 30 Sep 2014 17:13 PM

The Obama administration is initiating a program to give refugee status to some young people from Honduras, Guatemala an . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved