Defense Hawks Stand Firm Against Spending Cuts

Monday, 05 May 2014 12:03 PM

By Melanie Batley

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Congress has come to a virtual standstill on making decisions about defense spending, Politico reported.

"It used to be in the past when you do this, it was fairly easy," GOP Rep. Rob Wittman, chairman of the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Readiness, told the political news website. "You just move the top line and then you fit everything in."

He added, "What we're doing is saying, 'The top line is fixed,' and there's going to be some very spirited discussion about how do we make those priority discussions. And I don't expect everybody's going to leave satisfied."

The disputes, caused by lawmakers acting in their own states' interests, ultimately result in an inability to move forward with new defense equipment and fulfill some of the longer term priorities of the Pentagon.

For example, New Jersey and California members want Congress to require the Air Force to buy a minimum of 22 new KC-46A Pegasus tankers before it can begin divesting its existing KC-10 Extenders, Politico says. But North Carolina members would say the Air Force cannot deactivate the 440th Airlift Wing, based at Fort Bragg, while Arizona and Georgia members argue their Air Force must keep the fleet of A-10 Warthog attack jets.

There is a long list of similar disputes, Politico reported.

"This is not the way that intelligent, responsible people should be acting. I guess it's no surprise, but it is a disappointment," Virginia Democratic Rep. Jim Moran, a longtime defense appropriator, told Politico.

"We criticize CEOs for making decisions that are based solely upon improving their performance for the next quarter at the expense of long-term economic viability… Here we do the same damn thing."

Republicans argue that the solution is to spend more on defense, but Democrats say Congress should raise taxes, make some cuts, eliminate sequestration, and turn over more control to the Pentagon to determine these types of decisions.

Part of the problem, said Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James, is that decisions about the budget are inherently short-sighted. Defense spending is done on an a year-to-year, basis, making it difficult to make longer term decisions and priorities.

"I wish I could say that we'd ever be able to convince the Congress to do a two-year budget cycle. But that's been talked about for years, so I really don't see that on our horizon," James told Politico.

Related Stories:

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Lawyer: Detroit Case Could Spur Other Cities to File Chapter 9

Wednesday, 30 Jul 2014 20:21 PM

A New York lawyer told Newsmax TV on Wednesday that Detroit, by declaring bankruptcy and reaching a settlement that appe . . .

Rand Paul to Host: MSNBC Should Tell Truth About Me

Wednesday, 30 Jul 2014 20:10 PM

Sen. Rand Paul told an MSNBC host Wednesday he'll be happy to discuss his views on the Civil Rights Act "when your netwo . . .

Scientists: Earth Narrowly Escaped Devastating 2012 Solar Storm

Wednesday, 30 Jul 2014 19:07 PM

A powerful solar storm's near-miss with Earth two years ago could have wreaked massive havoc, but businesses and governm . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved