Supreme Court Abortion Buffer Zone Ruling Being Felt

Image: Supreme Court Abortion Buffer Zone Ruling Being Felt

Thursday, 10 Jul 2014 10:37 AM

By Jennifer G. Hickey

  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
The ripple effect of the Supreme Court's June 26 ruling in McCullen v. Coakley is being felt well outside of Massachusetts as attorneys general decide whether or not to enforce similar laws creating abortion clinic "buffer zones," according to news media reports.

In its unanimous opinion, the Supreme Court struck down a Massachusetts law establishing a 35-foot zone around the entrance and exit of abortion clinics holding that it violated an individual's constitutional right to engage in one-on-one advocacy and speech on public sidewalks, as well as to distribute pamphlets and other written materials.

New Hampshire has decided not to enforce a law creating a 25-foot buffer zone believing that plaintiffs in an ongoing lawsuit challenging the law will be victorious.

Like their lawsuit against Massachusetts, the Alliance for Defending Freedom have filed suit alleging the buffer zones constitute a violation of free speech, due process, and the equal protection clause because they only apply to areas outside of abortion clinics, thus criminalizing speech against abortion, reported.

The cities of Burlington, Vermont, and Madison, Wisconsin, also have decided to delay enforcing separate laws establishing buffer zones until they are deemed constitutional, The Huffington Post reported.

On July 7, the city council of Portland, Maine voted to repeal a local ordinance creating an abortion clinic buffer zone akin to the Massachusetts law, The Associated Press reported.

While pro-life groups seek other opportunities to challenge the legality of such laws, pro-choice activists are assessing their options and the broader impact of the Supreme Court's decision on laws across the country.

Immediately after the June 26 decision, Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said in a statement her organization was "taking a close look at this ruling, as well as patient protection laws around the country, to ensure that women can continue to make their own health care decisions without fear of harassment or intimidation."

Related Stories:

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Retype Email:
Zip Code:
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Family of Executed Man's Victims: 'He Laughed at Us'

Friday, 25 Jul 2014 07:20 AM

Jeanne Brown, whose sister and father were murdered in 1989 by Joseph Rudolph Wood, denied reports that Wood suffered du . . .

Joe Scarborough Denies Lobbying Hard for 'Meet the Press' Job

Thursday, 24 Jul 2014 23:07 PM

MSNBC's Joe Scarborough denied reports Thursday that he and his Morning Joe co-host Mika Brzezinski have been "aggress . . .

Laura Ingraham: Rand Paul Closest to Americans on Foreign Policy

Thursday, 24 Jul 2014 21:43 PM

Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, accused of being an isolationist by some fellow Republicans, is actually more in step with the  . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved