After Boston, Use of Public Cameras Sparks Privacy Debate

Monday, 22 Apr 2013 09:53 AM

By Melanie Batley

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print   |
    A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Lawmakers have begun debating the cost and benefits again of using public surveillance cameras as an anti-terrorism measure in the aftermath of the Boston Marathon bombings, where authorities relied heavily on video footage to hunt down suspects last week.

Some argue the widespread use of cameras poses a threat to privacy, The Hill reported Monday, while others argue there can no longer be any expectation of privacy in public when living under the threat of terrorism.

“I think in the larger cities [more cameras would be good], to the extent that people are willing to accept [them],” said House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Mike McCaul.

“In smaller towns, you’re going to have people who have privacy issues and they don’t want cameras. But in New York it’s pretty effective, and in larger cities,” the Texas Republican added.

The use of cameras has skyrocketed since the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. By one estimate, 30 million cameras have been sold in the United States in the last decade. They're being used for everything from security surveillance to monitoring speeding and other traffic violations.

Proponents of adding more surveillance cameras in public areas contend they are the best way to prevent attacks or track-down suspects, particularly in urban areas.

“If you walk down the street, anyone can look at you, anyone can see where you’re going. You have no expectation of privacy when you’re out in public,” Rep. Peter King, former chairman of the Homeland Security panel and member of the Intelligence Committee, told The Hill.

“This is not looking into someone’s home or doing something that would require a search warrant. We’re talking about something which is out in the open,” the New York Republican added.

But opponents claim the widespread use of cameras could impinge on civil liberties by intruding on the public’s right to privacy.

“There are appropriate uses for security cameras at large public events or at government buildings that are known targets,” said Michael German, a senior policy counsel for the ACLU and former FBI special agent.

“What we don’t want to happen is for millions of innocent Americans to have to be surveilled constantly anytime they go out in public and for the government to maintain databases of those public movements. That doesn’t necessarily improve security,” German said.

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print   |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Texas Ebola Hospital Losing Medicare Reimbursements Next Year

Saturday, 20 Dec 2014 12:13 PM

Texas Health Presbyterian Dallas, where two nurses were infected with the Ebola virus and the site of the only death fro . . .

Immigrants Build Document Trails to Remain in US

Saturday, 20 Dec 2014 10:47 AM

The search for documents is on for immigrants who may qualify for a work permit and reprieve from deportation under meas . . .

Google Sues to Block Mississippi AG Probe

Saturday, 20 Dec 2014 10:39 AM

Google filed a motion Friday in federal district court to block a subpoena by Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood, all . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved