Tags: birth | control | catholic | paid

US Defends Employer-Paid Birth Control to Appeals Court

Friday, 27 Dec 2013 12:39 PM

 

A bar to mandatory employer-paid birth control during a court challenge should be rejected, the Obama administration argued to an appeals court.

Lawyers for U.S. Health Secretary Kathleen Sebelius on Friday urged the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington to reject a request by the city’s Roman Catholic archbishop to delay a lower court’s decision in favor of the coverage, mandated by the Affordable Care Act, while the ruling is under appeal.

The archdiocese is not required by the law “to contract, arrange, pay or refer for contraceptive coverage” and an injunction pending appeal isn’t necessary, the government said in court papers.

“They need only self-certify that they are nonprofit organizations that hold themselves out as religious and have religious objections to providing coverage for contraceptive services and provide a copy of their self-certification to their health insurance issuer or third-party administrator,” the government said.

Lawyers for the archdiocese contend in their briefs that enforcement of the health plan “constitutes impermissible facilitation of objectionable services in violation of the Catholic doctrines of material cooperation with immoral conduct and ‘scandal.’”

The U.S. Supreme Court on Nov. 26 agreed to hear two cases brought by business owners who object on religious grounds to the birth-control mandate.

Lawsuit Plaintiffs

The lawsuits were filed by the craft store chain Hobby Lobby Stores Inc. and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. The cases will provide the court’s first look at President Barack Obama’s health-care bill since it upheld the core of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in 2012.

Appeals courts in Chicago, Denver, and Washington have ruled that the mandate may violate religious freedom. Appellate panels in Philadelphia and Cincinnati had sided with the government.

The appeals case is Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington v. Sebelius, 13-5371, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (Washington).

 

© Copyright 2015 Bloomberg News. All rights reserved.

Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Illegals Could Wait Until 2019 to Have Cases Resolved

Sunday, 01 Feb 2015 11:13 AM

Thousands of immigrants seeking legalization through the U.S. court system have had their hearings canceled and are bein . . .

California Suffers Dry January, Prolonging Devastating Drought

Sunday, 01 Feb 2015 10:40 AM

California has experienced one of the driest Januarys on record, and the lack of rain during a time of year when the wea . . .

Toddler Wounds Both Parents with 1 Shot from Handgun

Sunday, 01 Feb 2015 09:09 AM

Authorities say a 3-year-old boy got ahold of a handgun from his mother's purse and fired just one shot that wounded bot . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved