Rep. Barton: New Emissions Standard Will Cost Jobs

Tuesday, 02 Apr 2013 02:45 PM

By Sandy Fitzgerald and John Bachman

  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Rep. Joe Barton says the EPA's latest reduction of sulfur in gasoline emissions won't have any positive impact on people's health or the environment, but will likely cost jobs in the gas refining industry.

The Texas Republican, speaking to Newsmax TV's John Bachman, said it's “difficult to say that somebody is just flat wrong because everybody has good intentions” when speaking of health or environmental concerns. But Barton, the senior Republican and chairman emeritus of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said sulfur emissions have already been reduced significantly over the past two decades.

Story continues below.

“Under the Clinton administration, and then implemented by the Bush administration, we reduced the sulfur content of gasoline by 90 percent,” he said. “The standard right now is 30 parts per million and these new standards that the EPA put out on Good Friday – when everyone who’s a Christian like myself were thinking about the coming of Easter Sunday, not exactly focused on environmental regulations – they would reduce that further from 30 to 10.”

Barton said he's not aware of “any valid evidence that says going from 30 parts per million of sulfur content to 10 parts per million is going to have a positive health impact" because that minimum level is "almost impossible to even detect.”

But proponents of the tightened standard insist it will decrease air pollution, while giving automakers a level of predictability in the future. Barton acknowledged that the new standard makes "a little bit easier perhaps for Detroit to design engines, but he added, "These standards are supposed to protect public health and the current standard does that.”

Barton said the EPA “has trotted out the same old, tired set of statistics that somehow this is going to reduce the so-called premature death of many thousands a year and things like this. They’ve never been able to prove that, they won’t really share their data.”

The Texan insisted that he is not against strong environmental standards. "But I am against if tight’s good, tighter’s better, and that appears to be what this is.”

Barton also raised concerns about whether older, smaller refineries will be able to justify the costs of meeting the new standard.

“We have less refineries today than we had 20 or 30 years ago,” he said, predicting that some would likely shut down than try to retool their plans to meet the new emissions standard.

"There will be jobs lost," he said.

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Vikings Bring Back Peterson Despite Child Abuse Charge

Tuesday, 16 Sep 2014 06:57 AM

Adrian Peterson was back at Minnesota Vikings headquarters on Monday, and the first thing fullback Jerome Felton did whe . . .

Rutgers Professor: Guest Workers Are Stealing High-Tech Jobs

Tuesday, 16 Sep 2014 06:51 AM

Will borrowed workers make up the workforce of the future in the United States? One sociologist and professor is suggest . . .

Northern California Wildfire Burns 100 Homes

Monday, 15 Sep 2014 22:38 PM

A fire driven by fierce winds raced through the small town of Weed, Calif., near the Oregon border on Monday, burning a  . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved