* Appeals courts have issued conflicting rulings
* Supreme Court ruling expected before 2012 elections
(Adds details, paragraphs 4 to end; byline)
By James Vicini
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Obama administration
Monday cleared the way for the Supreme Court to decide in
its 2011-12 term the president's signature healthcare law that
requires Americans to buy insurance or face a penalty.
A Justice Department spokeswoman said it decided against
asking the full U.S. Appeals Court for the 11th Circuit to
review the August ruling by a three-judge panel of the court
that found the requirement unconstitutional.
The decision not to seek review by the full appeals court
will likely speed up consideration of the matter by the high
court in its 2011-12 term that begins next week. A ruling could
come by late June, in the middle of the presidential campaign.
The Supreme Court has long been expected to have the final
word on the legality of the individual mandate, a cornerstone
of President Barack Obama's healthcare law. A big uncertainty
has been over when the court would decide the issue.
The law's fate before the nine-member court, closely
divided with a conservative majority and four liberals, could
come down to two Republican appointees, Chief Justice John
Roberts and Justice Anthony Kennedy, legal experts have said.
The law, adopted by Congress in 2010 after a bruising
battle, is expected to be a major political issue in the 2012
elections as Obama seeks another four-year term. All the major
Republican presidential candidates oppose it.
Obama, a Democrat, has championed the individual mandate as
a major accomplishment of his presidency and as a way to try to
slow soaring healthcare costs while expanding coverage to the
more than 30 million Americans without it.
The 11th Circuit appeals court, based in Atlanta, ruled by
a 2-1 vote last month in favor of 26 states and others who
challenged the mandate for exceeding the power of Congress.
The Obama administration could have asked the full U.S.
11th Circuit Court of Appeals to reconsider its decision. But
that could have pushed back any Supreme Court ruling to its
The 2-1 ruling ruling conflicted with other appeals courts
that have upheld the law or have rejected legal challenges,
including a lawsuit by the state of Virginia which was
dismissed on procedural grounds.
A U.S. appeals court based in Cincinnati ruled Congress had
the power to adopt the individual mandate, which takes effect
in 2014. The losing side in that case, the Thomas More Law
Center, already appealed to the Supreme Court in July.
The administration has steadfastly maintained its belief
that the law will survive judicial scrutiny and be upheld by
the Supreme Court. The states that have challenged the law have
argued it went beyond Congress' authority to require coverage.
(Additional reporting by Jeremy Pelofsky; Editing by Doina
Chiacu and Eric Walsh)
© 2015 Thomson/Reuters. All rights reserved.