Tags: US | Nebraska | Immigration

Neb. City Council Votes to Delay Immigration Law

Tuesday, 27 Jul 2010 09:49 PM

 

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink

A voter-approved ban on hiring and renting property to illegal immigrants was suspended Tuesday by the Fremont City Council, less than two days before it was set to take effect in the eastern Nebraska city.

Council members voted 8-0 to delay an ordinance that is being challenged by two federal lawsuits, saying the move will save the city money in its legal defense.

The council narrowly rejected the ban in 2008, prompting supporters to gather enough signatures for the ballot measure. Voters approved the ban last month and it was scheduled to take effect Thursday.

The city faces lawsuits from the American Civil Liberties Union and the Mexican American Legal Defense & Educational Fund.

"We're relieved that the Fremont City Council will suspend this discriminatory ordinance while it's being litigated," Amy Miller, the ACLU of Nebraska's legal director, said in a statement. "It was a responsible decision that will spare residents of Fremont from worrying about losing housing and jobs because of their appearance and accent pending a final resolution by the court."

The ACLU expected to ask a federal judge Wednesday to temporarily block the ban from taking effect. After the vote, the group said it and the city plan to use the hearing to ask that the ordinance be blocked pending a final court resolution.

The ordinance has divided the community between those who say it makes up for what they call lax federal law enforcement and others who argue it could fuel discrimination.

Council members had insisted that any suspension would be aimed at saving money on the city's legal defense, but some ban supporters remained skeptical.

"They see it as another attempt by the city to block this ordinance," Jerry Hart, a Fremont resident who petitioned for the ballot measure, said ahead of the vote.

City officials have estimated Fremont's costs of implementing the ordinance — including legal fees, employee overtime and improved computer software — would average $1 million a year.

Council president Scott Getzschman has said it's unclear how much money the city would save by suspending enforcement of the ordinance. He insisted the council is only trying limit legal costs, even if the savings are small.

"It just boils down to the fact that the restraining order and injunction is imminent," Getzschman said before the vote. "And as the city of Fremont, we're looking at ways of reducing costs."

Betty Faux, 69, who owns a lake house just outside the 25,000-resident community, where dozens of homes along a main residential street flew American flags Tuesday, said that's not a good enough argument.

"I think they should go ahead with it; especially since they've got somebody who will represent them for free," Faux said, referring to Kansas City, Kan.-based attorney Kris Kobach, who drafted the Fremont ordinance and has said he would represent Fremont free of charge to fight lawsuits filed over the ordinance.

Kobach also helped write the Arizona law that directs officers to question people about their immigration status during the enforcement of other laws such as traffic stops and if there's a reasonable suspicion they're in the U.S. illegally.

Kobach told The Associated Press earlier Tuesday that if the council delayed implementation, it would mean fewer court hearings in the litigation process, making the process of hearing the lawsuits shorter and cheaper for the city.

The ordinance has put Fremont on the list with Arizona and other places in the national debate over immigration regulations. Arizona's sweeping law is set to take effect Thursday.

The ACLU and the Mexican American Legal Defense & Education Fund say the Fremont ordinance amounts to discrimination.

It would require employers to use a federal online system that checks whether a person is permitted to work in the U.S.

It also would require people seeking to rent property to apply for a $5 permit at City Hall. Those who said they were citizens would receive a permit and would not have to provide documents proving legal status. Those who said they weren't citizens would receive permits, but their legal status would be checked. If they're found to be in the country illegally and are unable to resolve their status, they would be forced to leave the property.

Landlords who knowingly rent to illegal immigrants could be subject to $100 fines.

© Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Ben Carson Tries to Clarify Stance on Second Amendment Rights

Thursday, 20 Nov 2014 15:42 PM

Potential 2016 Republican presidential candidate Dr. Ben Carson used a conference call with supporters Wednesday to tack . . .

'I Killed JFK' Producer: We Have Confession of Alleged JFK Killer

Thursday, 20 Nov 2014 14:49 PM

As the 51st anniversary of the assassination of former President John F. Kennedy is approaching, the producer of a new d . . .

Gallup Poll: Majority Say Healthcare Isn't Government's Duty

Thursday, 20 Nov 2014 14:49 PM

For the third consecutive year, a majority of Americans said it is not the role of the federal government to ensure all  . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved