WASHINGTON – Scientists say they have found a large underwater plume of oil that spewed from BP's ruptured Gulf of Mexico well, as a government expert expressed caution about estimates that most of the oil had disappeared.
The growing doubts came as US authorities said that crews would not completely seal the well until September, more than a month after plugging the site that triggered the world's worst-ever maritime oil spill.
Writing in the journal Science, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution marine biologists said they measured an oily underwater cloud stretching 35 kilometers (22 miles), two kilometers (one mile) wide) and 200 meters (650 feet) thick.
The observations were made in late June, several weeks before the ruptured wellhead was capped. But the scientists said the plume was not dissipating as rapidly as expected despite widespread use of dispersants.
Challenging US government estimates that most of the oil has dissipated, the authors said deep-sea microbes were degrading the plume only slowly and predicted the oil would endure for some time.
"We've shown conclusively not only that a plume exists, but also defined its origin and near-field structure," said lead author Richard Camilli.
The oil already "is persisting for longer periods than we would have expected," he added.
"Many people speculated that the sub-surface oil droplets were being easily downgraded. Well, we didn't find that. We found that it was still there."
However, he acknowledged that the biologists did not know the state of the plume two months after the spill and did not know enough to say if it was toxic.
US and BP officials this month proclaimed that about three-quarters of the oil which gushed into the Gulf had been cleaned up or dispersed through natural processes.
That claim has already been challenged by researchers from the University of Georgia who say government estimates are based on overly optimistic assumptions and that up to 80 percent of the spilled oil could still be in the Gulf's waters.
Bill Lehr, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration scientist who wrote the government's report, told lawmakers Thursday that figures were estimates and he was still assessing the effectiveness of chemical dispersants.
The report "should not be interpreted as saying that somehow the spill is over with," Lehr said.
Representative Ed Markey, a member of President Barack Obama's Democratic Party and strong advocate of environmental protection, criticized the initial release of the findings.
"People want to believe that everything is okay and I think this report and the way it is being discussed is giving many people a false sense of confidence regarding the state of the Gulf," Markey said.
Representative Darrell Issa, a Republican and sharp critic of Obama, accused the White House of manipulating science for political ends.
"This is yet another in a long line of examples where the White House's preoccupation with the public relations of the oil spill has superseded the realities on the ground," Issa said in a statement.
Around 4.9 million barrels of oil are believed to have spewed from the fractured wellhead before it was capped last month. US officials say that of that amount, 800,000 barrels were contained and funneled up to ships on the surface.
The Woods Hole team used a robotic submarine equipped with an underwater mass spectrometer to detect and analyze the plume, making repeated horizontal sweeps to ascertain its size and chemical composition.
The plume was then tracked for a distance of about 35 kilometers before the approach of Hurricane Alex forced the scientists to turn back.
"The plume was not a river of Hershey's Syrup," said Christopher Reddy, a marine biochemist. "But that's not to say it isn't harmful for the environment."
The damaged well was capped on July 15. Earlier this month, BP engineers plugged the site with heavy drilling fluid and then sealed it with cement.
Admiral Thad Allen, the clean-up chief, said that the definitive "bottom kill" that seals up the site would not occur before the Labor Day holiday on September 6.
The wait is partially to give BP time to test a replacement blowout preventer to ensure the new one can withstand pressure, he said.
© AFP 2016