Supreme Court: Anti-abortion Group Can Challenge Election Law

Monday, 16 Jun 2014 02:42 PM

By Lisa Degnen

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled Monday that an anti-abortion group could challenge an Ohio election law aimed at banning lies in political campaigns.

The Cleveland Plain Dealer reports that in April a group called the Susan B. Anthony List told the Supreme Court that a law allowing voters to file complaints about statements they deem untrue during a campaign is unconstitutional and prohibits their free speech.

"The threatened proceedings are of particular concern because of the burden they impose on electoral speech," Justice Clarence Thomas said, according to the report. "Moreover, the target of a complaint may be forced to divert significant time and resources to hire legal counsel and respond to discovery requests in the crucial days before an election."

Vote Now: Do You Approve Or Disapprove of President Obama's Job Performance?

The newspaper says the case was in reaction over ads the group placed against former Democratic Congressman Steve Driehaus because he backed Obamacare and voted for "taxpayer-funded abortion."

Driehaus said the exchanges would not use tax dollars to pay for abortions, except in cases of rape, incest, or to save the mother's life. He later dropped the complaint, the report says, but the Susan B. Anthony List decided to challenge the law on free speech grounds anyway.

Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine filed a separate legal brief to express his view that the law chills free speech, the Plain Dealer reported. More than a dozen other states have similar laws.

"Today's decision by the court is a step toward victory for freedom of speech and the broad coalition of groups who have supported SBA List throughout this case," SBA List President Marjorie Dannenfelser said. "The truth or falsity of political speech should be judged by voters, not government bureaucrats."

She also said her group will make the same claim against other members of Congress who backed Obamacare.

DeWine told the paper that was the right decision by the justices because the law could force an "average citizen" who put something on the Internet to hire attorneys to defend themselves if another citizen disagrees.

Both liberal and conservative groups have criticized the law, saying it has "a chilling effect on political speech," according to Fox News.

Vote Now: Do You Approve Or Disapprove of President Obama's Job Performance?

Related Stories:

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Hollywood's Own Horror Show: Summer Movie Season Worst in Years

Thursday, 24 Jul 2014 13:44 PM

Hollywood studios are in a state of near-financial panic over the dismal performance of American-made films this summer. . . .

Supreme Court Likely to Deal With Obamacare Subsidies Next Year

Thursday, 24 Jul 2014 11:56 AM

With the White House and most of official Washington still reeling from the back-to-back contradictory Obamacare rulings . . .

Two-hour Arizona Execution Sparks Calls for Rethink on Death Penalty

Thursday, 24 Jul 2014 11:22 AM

Lawyers for a double-murderer whose lethal injection in Arizona dragged on for two hours called for an outside review of . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved