Editorial: In Fla., Say No to 4, 5, 6 Amendments

Tuesday, 02 Nov 2010 09:49 AM

By Newsmax Editorial

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Florida voters should say “no” to three constitutional amendments on the ballot today that would harm taxpayers, undermine the state’s economy, and hurt democratic values.

Amendment 4 would require voter approval of all changes to local comprehensive land-use plans. Opponents argue that it will cost jobs and hurt Florida’s economy by stifling growth, thereby costing taxpayers millions of dollars.

Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush declared in a recent Op-Ed piece that the amendment “has the potential to completely stall our economy, making it harder to create and grow jobs and to responsibly manage growth in our state.”

One Florida city that enacted a similar law found it caused years of costly litigation that burdened taxpayers and drove jobs elsewhere.

Supporters of the amendment say voters deserve a “seat at the table” on growth decisions in their cities and counties. But voters are already in control of comprehensive plans by electing city and county officials who best represent their views on development.

It is crucial to Florida’s future that this amendment goes down to defeat.

Amendments 5 and 6 would allow Florida’s courts to draw redistricting maps. They would require that district plans may not be drawn to favor or disfavor an incumbent or political party. They also would mandate that the districts be contiguous, compact, and — where feasible — make use of existing city, county, and geographical boundaries.

Amendment 5 pertains to legislative redistricting; Amendment 6, to congressional redistricting.

It is clear that the plans would be difficult, if not impossible, to implement, and would lead to endless litigation. They would increase the likelihood that any redistricting plan the state Legislature devises would be subject to protracted litigation and ultimately would be replaced by a plan created by judges rather than by elected representatives.

As Jeb Bush has pointed out, the amendments could jeopardize the progress Florida has made in creating opportunities for all individuals to serve in their government.

Supporters assert that the amendments would rein in gerrymandering. But true communities of interest aren’t necessarily compact and don’t fall easily along political boundary lines, such as counties. Force-fitting districts within those lines makes it difficult to group voters on the basis of genuine common interest.

Opponents also say it's a trial lawyers relief act, and unaccountable judges would steer power to the political left.

Voters should say “no” on Amendments 4, 5, and 6.

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Boston Bombing Nightmare Leads Survivor to Dream Startup

Monday, 21 Apr 2014 06:15 AM

Hours after the blast that ruptured an eardrum and left a 9-inch gash in one leg -- but spared her life -- Amanda North  . . .

Public Funding for U.S. Colleges Rebounds After Years of Decline

Monday, 21 Apr 2014 06:12 AM

Public funding for U.S. colleges increased for only the second time in five years last year, following declines that for . . .

Country Singer and Cancer Survivor Kevin Sharp Dies at 43

Sunday, 20 Apr 2014 22:51 PM

Kevin Sharp, who survived cancer as a teenager and went on to become a successful country music singer in the 1990s, die . . .

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved