Anti-union Groups Win Voice at NLRB Volkswagen Hearing

Tuesday, 11 Mar 2014 03:47 PM

 

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
The National Labor Relations Board has decided that anti-union Volkswagen workers can defend the results of a mid-February union election that the United Auto Workers lost at a Chattanooga, Tenn., VW plant.

The NLRB's unusual ruling gives anti-UAW groups, such as the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation and Southern Momentum, more leverage in the fight over unionizing the plant.

The ruling means that if the NLRB holds a hearing on the dispute, the anti-UAW workers may participate and make their case, along with the UAW. No hearing has been scheduled, though labor lawyers have said there likely will be one.

The UAW is trying to expand into the American South among non-union, foreign-owned auto plants. But its effort last month collided with opposition from senior Tennessee Republican politicians, such as Sen. Bob Corker and Gov. Bill Haslam, as well as outside interest groups, including one from Washington headed by small-government crusader Grover Norquist.

The UAW lost its effort to organize the VW plant when workers voted 712-626 not to join the union. It then asked the NLRB to set aside the results of the election, arguing that outside parties compromised the process.

The Chattanooga dispute is unusual in several ways. VW remained technically neutral during the UAW campaign, though the German company gave the union access to its facilities during the days leading up to the election. Employers often oppose union campaigns. The automaker also said it would not defend election results before the board.

The NLRB's regional office in Atlanta is handling the UAW's challenge to the election. That office is investigating whether outside groups interfered in the election process. Its findings can be appealed to the five-member NLRB board in Washington.

Former NLRB General Counsel Fred Feinstein said in an interview on Monday that the regional office's determination in the case "is a couple of months off. And it could take a lot longer than that."

© 2014 Thomson/Reuters. All rights reserved.

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

GSK Ebola Vaccine Fast-tracked for Human Trials

Wednesday, 26 Nov 2014 20:37 PM

Preliminary results are promising from trials in human volunteers in the United States for one of the leading Ebola vacc . . .

Gun-Buy Background Checkers Overwhelmed, Fear Black Friday

Wednesday, 26 Nov 2014 20:29 PM

While gun-control advocates keep up the pressure for extended background checks on firearms buyers, last year the federa . . .

Cosby Testimony Describes Accuser's Spiked Story

Wednesday, 26 Nov 2014 19:57 PM

Bill Cosby testified under oath in 2005 that he gave the National Enquirer an exclusive interview about looming sexual-a . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved