Court in Va. to Hear US Health Care Law Challenges

Tuesday, 10 May 2011 11:24 AM

 

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — President Barack Obama's health care overhaul will get its first oral arguments in federal appeals court Tuesday when a three-judge panel hears two Virginia cases — one that upheld the law and another that struck down its key provision.

Nine lawsuits challenging the law are pending on appeal, but the Virginia cases before the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals are the first to reach the oral argument stage. Thirteen cases have been dismissed with no appeal filed, and nine are pending in district courts, according to federal officials.

In the most prominent of the two Virginia cases, U.S. District Judge Henry E. Hudson struck down the health care law's key provision: a requirement that individuals buy health insurance or pay a penalty starting in 2014. Thirty-one lawsuits challenging the law have been filed nationally, and Hudson — a 2002 appointee of President George W. Bush — was the first judge to strike down any of its provisions. Hudson left the rest of the law intact.

"An individual's personal decision to purchase — or decline to purchase — health insurance from a private provider is beyond the historical reach of the Commerce Clause," Hudson wrote in the Dec. 13 opinion, which the U.S. Justice Department promptly appealed.

U.S. District Judge Norman K. Moon in Lynchburg reached the opposite conclusion in a lawsuit filed by Liberty University, the conservative Christian school founded by the Rev. Jerry Falwell. Two weeks before Hudson's ruling, the 1997 appointee of President Bill Clinton ruled that the mandate is a proper exercise of congressional authority under the Commerce Clause.

Court officials expect a packed house for the back-to-back hearings. Courtroom doors will be opened two hours early, and a closed-circuit television feed of the proceedings will be shown in a second courtroom. Also, for the first time, the court will make an audio recording of the hearings available on its website later in the day.

The appeals court in Richmond will hear the Liberty case at 9:30 a.m., then the lawsuit filed by Virginia Attorney General Kenneth T. Cuccinelli. The hearings are scheduled to last 40 minutes each, and rulings are expected in a few weeks.

Cuccinelli said Monday his team spent about an hour and a half practicing on the eve of the arguments. They had the advantage, he said, because they will get to hear the Liberty case and then will go last in their case, so they will know what the judges' questions are.

"It's probably the most important case any of the lawyers on the matter will ever work on in their lives, and we all recognize that's what it is," he said. "But it is straight legal argument. We've done the work and we're ready to go."

Neither side will know which three justices from the 14-member bench will hear the cases before Tuesday morning.

"Regardless of whether the Fourth Circuit panel hearing the case is composed of liberal judges like Diana Motz or conservatives like J. Harvie Wilkinson III, the result should be the same: the ACA is constitutional," said Elizabeth Wydra, chief counsel for the Constitutional Accountability Center, which filed brief in the case defending the constitutionality of the health care overhaul.

Cuccinelli said if he is not successful, he will appeal directly to the U.S. Supreme Court.

"We'd like a good hearing and a good opinion, obviously, out of the 4th Circuit, but at the same time this is all just in the course of doing business and we don't want to get overwrought about it even as important as it is," he said.

Cuccinelli asked the Supreme Court to take up his case without waiting for an appeals court review, but his petition — which the Justice Department opposed — was rejected. The case could still reach the Supreme Court in time for a decision by early summer 2012.

Cuccinelli said he was confident, but acknowledged that the case was unprecedented and anything could happen.

"If I had to bet on one side or the other, I'd bet on us," Cuccinelli said. "But I wouldn't bet everything."

___

Associated Press Writer Dena Potter contributed to this article.

© Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Ferguson Unrest Blamed On Too Many Police Agencies

Friday, 22 Aug 2014 14:55 PM

Police tried various tactics while attempting to bring calm to the strife-torn suburb of Ferguson, Missouri - but were h . . .

Nanny State: NC Students Denied Their Choice of School

Friday, 22 Aug 2014 14:37 PM

As the school year begins in North Carolina, many students don't know whether they'll be allowed to attend the schools o . . .

Sen. Claire McCaskill Sets Hearing on 'Militarization of Police'

Friday, 22 Aug 2014 13:53 PM

In the wake of the violent clashes between police and protesters in Ferguson, Missouri, Sen. Claire McCaskill has announ . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved