Harry Reid Weighs New Limits on Senate Republicans

Image: Harry Reid Weighs New Limits on Senate Republicans

Monday, 10 Feb 2014 07:16 AM

By Elliot Jager

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada is being lobbied by liberal groups to broaden his November 2013 filibuster reform – which reduces the number of votes needed to defeat a filibuster from 60 to a simple majority – to make it harder still for the Republican minority to block legislation, The Hill reported.

One idea would, in effect, end virtual filibusters by requiring GOP senators to hold the floor and speak continuously around the clock. Another change would eliminate "blue-slipping" – the tradition of granting senators approval for judicial nominees in their states.

Urgent: Is Obamacare Hurting Your Wallet? Vote in Poll

Liberal and labor groups have coalesced behind Fix the Senate Now, which is calling on Reid to consider steps to hasten the confirmation of President Barack Obama's 32 pending judicial nominees, according to The Hill.

Democrats worry that if Republicans recapture the Senate in the 2014 elections, few Obama judicial nominees would be confirmed.

Reid is averse to another confrontation with Republicans over Senate rules but is also exasperated by GOP obstructionism. "Reid is not afraid to go further and considers reform this year a real possibility," a Democratic Senate source told The Hill.

Labor leaders are incensed that the Senate did not vote on a three-month extension of unemployment benefits. African-American leaders are irate that Georgia Republican Sens. Saxby Chambliss and Johnny Isakson used their influence to push through approvals for two judges for the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals whom the leaders view as having problematic civil rights records.

The Congressional Black Caucus has also criticized Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., and Richard Burr, R-N.C., for blocking home state African-American nominees.

Republican sources told The Hill that the Democratic majority "should respect the system of checks and balances that our founders established and resist the power-hungry elements in their own base that care more about their own special interests than they do about fealty to the law."

Urgent: Is Obamacare Hurting Your Wallet? Vote in Poll

Related Stories:



© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Florida State Suspends Winston for Entire Game

Saturday, 20 Sep 2014 07:36 AM

Top-ranked Florida State will face Clemson without Jameis Winston - for the entire game and not just the first half.Flor . . .

Pope Names Moderate as Chicago Archbishop

Saturday, 20 Sep 2014 07:28 AM

Pope Francis, in his first major appointment in the hierarchy of the Catholic Church in the United States, on Saturday n . . .

Kentucky Preservation Society Cracking Century Old Bourbons

Saturday, 20 Sep 2014 07:13 AM

A Louisville preservation society will raise a glass in December to toast the end of the Prohibition Era, but not with j . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved