Newt Gingrich: SuperPACs Will Make a Mess of 2016

Image: Newt Gingrich: SuperPACs Will Make a Mess of 2016

Thursday, 03 Apr 2014 10:09 AM

By Courtney Coren

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
The Supreme Court's decision to remove the limit on the number of candidates donors are allowed to contribute to is a victory, but with SuperPAC donations still secret, the 2016 presidential election is shaping up to be a mess, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich writes.

The ruling is "an important first step in defense of the First Amendment," but doesn't go far enough to make political donations as transparent as they could be, Gingrich wrote in an opinion piece for Time magazine.

"While this situation is better than the blatantly unconstitutional campaign finance laws that came before it, it still makes a farce of our elections and muddles the political process for normal Americans, who can't know who is really behind the billions of dollars worth of ads they see on television," the former presidential candidate wrote.

"This secretive, confusing system is already shaping up to make a mess of the 2016 presidential elections as many of the likely candidates on both sides establish supposedly 'independent' SuperPACs run by their former staff and loyal supporters that will spend hundreds of millions on activities the candidates themselves can claim they're not responsible for."

Gingrich said that he agrees with what Justice Clarence Thomas suggested in his concurring opinion that the "meaningless distinction between 'contributions' to specific candidates and 'expenditures' on their behalf" by SuperPACs should be abolished.

But the former House speaker wrote that in order to do this, the limit on the amount individuals are allowed to give to candidates directly would have to be removed. The Supreme Court decision retained the $2,600 limit, arguing that it prevents corruption.

"I'd add the provision that all significant contributions should be reported publicly on the Internet in real-time, which would make for a far more transparent and accountable campaign finance system than we have today," he wrote.

Related Stories:

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Instructor Death: 9-Year-Old Girl Said Uzi Was Too Much For Her

Tuesday, 02 Sep 2014 13:56 PM

A 9-year-old girl who accidentally killed an instructor with an Uzi at an Arizona shooting range said immediately after  . . .

Family: Joan Rivers on Life Support

Tuesday, 02 Sep 2014 13:45 PM

Joan Rivers' family is confirming that the comedian is on life support after going into cardiac arrest last week during  . . .

Report: Illinois Teachers Paid Well Despite Fiscal Woes

Tuesday, 02 Sep 2014 13:44 PM

Illinois has the lowest credit rating in the nation, but that has not prevented the state's Teachers' Retirement System  . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved