Napolitano: President Can't Order Drone Strike on American Under Constitution

Tuesday, 11 Feb 2014 08:55 AM

By Wanda Carruthers

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
President Barack Obama does not have the constitutional authority to order a drone strike on an American who officials claim was fighting with al-Qaida and plotting terrorist attacks against the U.S., former Judge Andrew Napolitano said Tuesday.

Obama "does not have war powers to kill an American . . . There are two clauses in the Constitution that specifically protect Americans," Napolitano, a former New Jersey Superior Court judge, told "Fox & Friends."

Napolitano said it was "defined as treason" if an American was waging war on the U.S. Under that circumstance, he said American citizens were guaranteed a jury trial and could not be convicted "unless there were two witnesses to the same overt act."

Officials admitted Monday a U.S. citizen was suspected of actively planning to attack Americans overseas. Officials within the Obama administration stated they had been debating whether to kill him under a new drone strike policy.

The new drone policy stipulates targeted killings must be in an ongoing military conflict, the target must have taken up arms against the U.S., there must be no possibility of arresting the suspect, and the decision must be made by senior political leaders.

Napolitano said the drone policy was written by the president and, therefore, was not U.S. law. He said only the Constitution allowed Congress to write laws.

"Only the Congress can enact a law, especially a law giving the president authority to kill an American," Napolitano said. "The president's efforts to bypass the Constitution . . . in foreign affairs is just as unconstitutional as its efforts to bypass the Constitution in domestic affairs."

The law allowed an American suspected of terrorism against the U.S. to be kidnapped, arrested, or put on trial, Napolitano said. However, to target a drone strike on an individual suspected of terrorism was "an insufficient basis to execute him without a trial."

Napolitano argued that even if Congress authorized the action against the American suspect, "it would still be against the constitutional protections that he's afforded."

Related Stories:


© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Rep. Blackburn: DEA Official Accused Me of 'Supporting Criminals'

Wednesday, 01 Oct 2014 16:56 PM

Rep. Marsha Blackburn says a Drug Enforcement Administration official accused her and a colleague of supporting crimina . . .

White House Intruder Pleads Not Guilty

Wednesday, 01 Oct 2014 16:27 PM

A knife-carrying U.S. Army veteran who jumped a fence and ran into the White House, triggering a ferocious debate about  . . .

GMO Products Remain Source of Controversy, Heated Debate

Wednesday, 01 Oct 2014 15:39 PM

On Sept. 17, the Department of Agriculture granted an OK to use genetically modified corn and soybean seeds that are res . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved