Breitbart's Hawkins: 'Smart' Mandate Makes Guns 'Rich Man's Game'

Image: Breitbart's Hawkins: 'Smart' Mandate Makes Guns 'Rich Man's Game'

Monday, 12 May 2014 03:26 PM

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print   |
    A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
If New Jersey proceeds to mandate "smart guns" and prohibit the sale of regular firearms, it will price law-abiding, lower income Garden State residents out of protecting themselves, Breitbart's AWR Hawkins writes.

With one such weapon — the $1,800, .22-caliber Armatix iP1 — poised to reach the market, a statewide ban on existing guns would put lawful self-protection beyond the reach of people who can't pay that premium, Hawkins writes.

Existing .22s — which don't have fingerprinting or password technology to prevent firing by unauthorized users — typically cost $400 or less new. A mandate for sidearms costing more than four times as much "will effectively turn gun ownership into a rich man's game," writes Hawkins.

New Jersey passed its smart-gun law in 2002 with a provision that it be enacted when technologically feasible smart guns went on sale anywhere in the United States. Once that happens, the law forbids legitimate gun dealers in New Jersey from selling any other kind of weapon.

The Armatix iP1's path to market is far from certain. Two U.S. firearms dealers, in California and suburban Washington, D.C., shelved plans to retail the high-tech pistol after a backlash from gun owners and the National Rifle Association. Smart-gun critics said the sale would trigger New Jersey's ban and set a precedent for restricting gun owners' Second Amendment rights.

The furor even prompted some Democrats in New Jersey to rethink their strategy. The heavily Democratic state's Senate majority leader said she would introduce a bill to repeal the law if the NRA would, in return, agree to let smart guns circulate.

The NRA responded with a statement calling for "a full repeal of New Jersey's misguided law" but didn't elaborate on any deals.

Meanwhile, The Washington Post urged New Jersey to keep, and begin enforcing, the smart-gun law.

"The more smart guns that take the place of old, unsafe, and outdated firearms, the better," said a Post editorial last week.

Breitbart's Hawkins responded that a mandate would mean "only the wealthy will able to afford guns, while the poor will be left to hope the locks on their doors are strong enough to keep home invaders out."

"There is nothing smart about pricing guns out of the reach of a single mom, raising two children in the inner city," he wrote.

Related Stories:

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print   |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Boston Bomb Suspect’s Friend Pleads Guilty to Gun Charge

Friday, 19 Dec 2014 19:41 PM

A close friend of Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev pleaded guilty to owning the handgun Tsarnaev allege . . .

Obama Appointee's Group Accused of Illegal Politicking

Friday, 19 Dec 2014 19:09 PM

A nonprofit group run by an Obama administration appointee may have supported Democratic mayoral candidates in Californi . . .

Rep. Erik Paulsen: Obamacare About to Hit Every American

Friday, 19 Dec 2014 18:41 PM

Minnesota Rep. Erik Paulsen says that every American is about to feel the effects of Obamacare when tax season hits in 2 . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved