Wal-Mart Loses Appeal of $187 Million Verdict in Worker Lawsuit

Monday, 13 Jun 2011 02:56 PM

 

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print   |
    A   A  
  Copy Shortlink

Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the world’s largest retailer, lost its appeal of a $187.6 million verdict in a case accusing the company of denying Pennsylvania workers rest and meal breaks.

A three-member appeals court panel ruled June 10 that there was “sufficient evidence” in the record to conclude Wal-Mart violated state wage laws for contractual rest breaks. The court ruled that the trial court must recalculate more than $45 million in attorneys’ fees in the case.

“Wal-Mart’s own internal audits revealed violations of company policies regarding missed breaks and work off-the-clock,” the panel said in a 211-page opinion.

The verdict is the largest against Wal-Mart over missed breaks, Michael Donovan, an attorney for the Pennsylvania workers said. Wal-Mart agreed to pay as much as $640 million in 2008 to settle more than 60 federal and state lawsuits over similar claims.

Former Wal-Mart employees Dolores Hummel and Michele Braun sued the company in state court in Philadelphia over claims they were pressured by store managers to skip breaks and cut meals short. Lawyers for the women argued that the company made workers skip more than 33 million rest breaks from 1998 to 2001 to boost productivity and cut labor costs.

Wal-Mart argued on appeal that the trial court erred in certifying a class of about 187,000 current and former employees and refusing to dismiss claims under the state wage laws.

‘Unique Facts’

In its decision, the appeals panel wrote, “Under these unique facts and the liberal construction of Pennsylvania’s class-action rules, we hold the record substantiates the trial court’s certification of the class and discern no denial of due process.”

Greg Rossiter, a spokesman for Bentonville, Arkansas-based Wal-Mart, said today that the retailer is committed to paying employees for every hour they work and providing them with meal and rest breaks.

“That’s our policy and we take it very seriously,” Rossiter said in a phone interview. “In this case, we believe the trial court’s decision was wrong in a number of respects and we look forward to additional review in the courts.”

Donovan called the ruling a “well-reasoned decision in support of workers’ rights.”

The Pennsylvania cases are Braun v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., 3373 EDA 2007, and Hummel v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., 3376 EDA 2007, Superior Court of Pennsylvania.


© Copyright 2014 Bloomberg News. All rights reserved.

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print   |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Boehner's Christmas Carol Celebrates a GOP Congress

Thursday, 18 Dec 2014 23:15 PM

Republican House Speaker John Boehner put his own political spin on "a Christmas reading" on his YouTube page Thursday,  . . .

Dershowitz: Hollywood Should Have Followed Rushdie Example

Thursday, 18 Dec 2014 22:29 PM

Hollywood should have rallied around Sony Pictures and released "The Interview" jointly online, says Harvard law profess . . .

Army Pulls ROTC Job Posting Requiring Christian Candidates

Thursday, 18 Dec 2014 22:18 PM

The Army has pulled a job posting at an Illinois religious college that required leaders of its ROTC program to be Chris . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved