Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s bailout terms are being challenged by a group of investors led by hedge fund Perry Capital LLC, who are suing the U.S. Treasury in federal court for the 2012 changes to the terms.
The Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court in Washington this past weekend. The suit alleges that the Treasury and the regulator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac violated a 2008 law that put the two government-owned mortgage companies into conservatorship as they faced insolvency at the height of the U.S. financial crisis, according to Reuters.
Editor's Note: Do You Support Obamacare? Vote in Urgent National Poll
The Treasury Department amended the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bailout terms last year, forcing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to hand over most of their profits to the government, replacing a requirement that the companies pay quarterly dividends of 10 percent on the government's nearly 80 percent stake.
The suit names both Treasury and the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), which regulates Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Perry Capital, which began investing in both firms in 2010, claimed in the lawsuit that shareholder value was impaired when the government instituted a "dividend sweep."
The new arrangement prevents the firms from building capital that might have allowed them to redeem the government shares and eventually operate independently to the benefit of private shareholders.
The bailout agreement provides no mechanism for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to repay the $187.5 billion they owe the government from their 2008 bailout.
The two companies have returned to profitability, and by the end of June, had paid about $132 billion in dividends to taxpayers. Their financial health has prompted investors to snap up the preferred stock of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in a bet they will be made private companies in the future.
"This lawsuit seeks to uphold the rule of law," Theodore Olson, a partner at the law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and a former U.S. solicitor general, said in a statement.
He said the 2008 Housing and Economic Recovery Act, known as HERA, established specific rules about the government's limits and obligations under conservatorship.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s profits have also led Perry Capital and other hedge funds including Paulson & Co. to push Congress to consider a privatization of the two mortgage financiers to boost the value of preferred shares they have bought.
"Investors had every right to expect these rules to be followed," Olson added.
Republicans and Democrats, along with President Barack Obama, want to abolish both mortgage companies, but have yet to agree on the right approach.
A bipartisan group of U.S. senators last month introduced a bill that would liquidate the companies and replace them with a government reinsurer of mortgage securities that would backstop private capital in a crisis.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac do not make loans but instead buy them from lenders and package them as bonds, and guarantee them against default. A key part of the housing system, the two mortgage financiers own or back about half of all U.S. home loans.
Perry Capital manages investment funds for the benefit of retirement plans, university endowments, foundations, insurance companies and other institutional and private investors. Perry Capital has made significant investments in many different housing related securities, according to a press release.
A lawyer involved in the litigation, speaking on condition of anonymity, explained what the plaintiff is seeking to reporters on a conference call.
"What we're seeking is to require Treasury and the FHFA to obey the rules set forth in the Housing and Economic Recovery Act [of 2008]. There are no damages being sought."
Editor's Note: Get the Navy SEALs Cap – Celebrate Our Heroes
Senators to Propose Replacement for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac
Fannie and Freddie Make $66.3 Billion Payment to Treasury
© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.