Against Grain: Brewers, Farmers Fight FDA's Proposed Regulation

Wednesday, 23 Apr 2014 12:53 PM

By Clyde Hughes

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print   |
    A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Brewers and farmers are fighting a proposed rule by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to end the practice of brewers giving leftover grain to local farmers to feed cows, potentially costing both industries thousands of dollars.

For centuries, brewers have given or sold the leftover grain from the brewing process to local ranchers and dairy farmers for cattle feed, and the arrangement was mutually beneficial. Farmers had access to cheap or free grain, while brewers didn't have to worry about taking the grain to landfills. But the new regulations proposed by the FDA threatens to end that relationship, according to Fox News.

Urgent: Do You Approve Or Disapprove of President Obama's Job Performance? Vote Now in Urgent Poll

The regulation, intended to prevent food-borne illnesses like salmonella by regulating the grain, is part of the Food Safety Modernization Act passed by Congress in 2011. The regulation would require breweries to monitor, clean, and sample the grain before taking it to farmers. 

According to a study by the Beer Institute and the American Malt Barley Association, this would translate an investment of $13.6 million annually from breweries in terms of manpower and machinery, according to the Coloradoan.

"This is the kind of recycling story we want to see continue," Chris Thorne, of the Washington-based Beer Institute, said.

An editorial by The Oregonian argues that the FDA rule creates an expensive solution to a problem that does not exist. 

"Keep in mind the grains were judged to be fit for human consumption upon arrival at the breweries," the editorial read. "But at the back end of a food-production process for humans the grains might, if only through distribution, pick up contamination and trigger an outbreak of some sort among suffering cows. And nobody recalls a cow ever getting sick from eating the sweet mush — not even the FDA."

In response to the backlash, the FDA said it will amend the regulation by the summer.

"We are working to develop regulations that are responsive to the concerns expressed, practical for businesses, and that also help ensure that food for animals is safe and will not cause injury to animals or humans," Juli Putnam said on behalf of FDA.

Thorne told the Coloradoan that he was "cautiously optimistic" that the FDA will come to a practical decision.

Urgent: Assess Your Heart Attack Risk in Minutes. Click Here.

Related Stories:

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print   |
  Copy Shortlink
Send me more news as it happens.
Get me on The Wire
Send me more news as it happens.
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
You May Also Like

Cambodia HIV Outbreak: 100-Plus People Diagnosed; Investigation Sought

Friday, 19 Dec 2014 18:50 PM

More than 100 HIV infections in a single Cambodian village have spurred the country's prime minister to ask for an inves . . .

Slender Man Case: Two Girls Competent to Stand Trial in Stabbing

Friday, 19 Dec 2014 18:26 PM

Two girls who allegedly stabbed a 12-year-old friend over the online game Slender Man are competent to stand trial for a . . .

Kate Upton Sexiest Woman Alive; Model Apologizes to Teen Brother

Friday, 19 Dec 2014 17:52 PM

Model Kate Upton was selected as People magazine's first Sexiest Woman Alive, a month after Chris Hemsworth received the . . .

Top Stories

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved