Tags: Tim | Scott | NLRB | Boeing

Rep. Scott: Limiting NLRB Reach Is Not Anti-Union

Friday, 16 Sep 2011 03:20 AM

By Hiram Reisner

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print   |
    A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Rep. Tim Scott says a House-passed bill to limit the reach of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) is not anti-union, but is a measure aimed at reducing how much control government can have over public-sector business.
 
The South Carolina Republican also told Fox News’ Neal Cavuto Thursday he believes there are enough votes in the Democratic-controlled House to pass the legislation and bring it to President Barack Obama’s desk.

The bill was introduced to counter an NLRB suit that alleges that Boeing punished union workers in Washington state for past strikes by opening a new plant in right-to-work South Carolina.

Boeing denies the allegations, and the aircraft giant has received wide-ranging GOP support, including from South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley and Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C. The bill limiting NLRB control passed in the House Thursday.

“My hope is that with Senator Jim DeMint and other folks getting involved in the Senate that this has an opportunity to get a vote on the floor of the Senate,” Scott said. “And if it does, I believe that there will be enough senators on the Democratic side to support this bill because it really is not an anti-union bill — it is absolutely an anti-federal government overreach bill.”
 
Cavuto noted that the NLRB is considered an independent agency and any legislative or legal efforts to curb the board’s power might be for naught.
“I say that is a false argument,” Scott said. “This case has not come to its final adjudication and, therefore, we have an opportunity to continue to work towards having a legislative solution to a problem that is created because of the regulatory environment.

“I absolutely believe that the NLRB [is] showing favoritism towards unions and towards things that they believe strengthens the president`s re-election campaign, from my perspective,” he said. “Ultimately what would happen is that there is a process that would take multiple years in the worst-case scenario that would cost the Boeing Company millions upon millions of dollars, which means that we are now destroying more American jobs.”

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print   |
  Copy Shortlink
Send me more news as it happens.
 
 
Get me on The Wire
Send me more news as it happens.
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
You May Also Like

Cambodia HIV Outbreak: 100-Plus People Diagnosed; Investigation Sought

Friday, 19 Dec 2014 18:50 PM

More than 100 HIV infections in a single Cambodian village have spurred the country's prime minister to ask for an inves . . .

Slender Man Case: Two Girls Competent to Stand Trial in Stabbing

Friday, 19 Dec 2014 18:26 PM

Two girls who allegedly stabbed a 12-year-old friend over the online game Slender Man are competent to stand trial for a . . .

Kate Upton Sexiest Woman Alive; Model Apologizes to Teen Brother

Friday, 19 Dec 2014 17:52 PM

Model Kate Upton was selected as People magazine's first Sexiest Woman Alive, a month after Chris Hemsworth received the . . .

Top Stories

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved