GOP Establishment at Odds With Base

Tuesday, 19 Feb 2013 09:55 AM

By Scott Rasmussen

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
There's still a lot of confusion in the Republican Party in the aftermath of the 2012 election. Part of the confusion stems from the struggle between the party establishment based in Washington and the party's base of voters all over the country. Sixty-three percent of Republican voters nationwide recognize that their leaders in Washington have lost touch with the base.
 
Added to that challenge is the debate over what type of change is needed. Some argue that the party needs to simply change the message and find a better way to sell its product. Others argue that more substantive policy changes are needed.
 
To end the party's civil war, both sides need to change. The Republican base needs to make its message of limited government more palatable to more Americans. Bigger fixes are necessary for the party establishment. Right now, it acts as if only cosmetic changes are needed. For example, since the party had trouble with Hispanic voters, let rising star Marco Rubio deliver the GOP response to President Obama's State of the Union address. From the view of Washington Republicans, the only other thing that's needed is for the base to become more "pragmatic."
 
However, if the Republican base had listened to the establishment a few years back, Rubio would still be unknown. The establishment's definition of pragmatism at that time was to oppose Rubio and back former Florida Gov. Charlie Crist, who is now a Democrat.

Yes, it's important for Republicans to make more of an effort to reach out to the Hispanic community, but it needs to be substantive outreach based on common ground and values. Rubio may be able to help, but it will be because of his message, not his heritage.
 
Today, the Republican establishment would rather keep wrangling with the Democratic establishment, risking irrelevance because it has neither power nor a large group of supporters.
 
As for the GOP base, sincere talk about limited government clearly doesn't work. Not enough voters care about limited government as a goal unto itself. People care about the kind of society a limited government can create.
 
Too often when Democrats propose an idea that sounds good and addresses a perceived need, Republicans say it's not what the Founders would have wanted. From a messaging perspective, voters want to hear positive solutions rather than theoretical objections.
 
Case in point: The president just called for more spending on infrastructure, clean energy, and education projects. In each case, he claimed they would help the economy. A solid plurality of voters agrees with him on the first two items. And when it comes to spending more on education, 56 percent believe it would help the economy, while just 23 percent believe it would hurt.
 
A political party that simply says "no" can only count on that 23 percent of the vote.
 
If voters are given a choice, however, the numbers shift. What would do more to help the economy, cutting government spending or spending more on the president's initiatives? Fifty-five percent say cutting spending, while just 36 percent favor the new initiatives. Support is even higher when the choice is between cutting the deficit and the new spending plans.
 
For Republicans to succeed, they need to do a much better job of spelling out choices to the voters. Instead of couching things in black-and-white terms, they need to make clear the real-life implications of their policies. The party establishment needs to listen to GOP voters and find more effective ways of turning their ideas into an uplifting vision for the 21st century.
 
Scott Rasmussen is founder and president of Rasmussen Reports. He is the author of “Mad as Hell: How the Tea Party Movement Is Fundamentally Remaking Our Two-Party System,” “In Search of Self-Governance,” and “The People’s Money: How Voters Will Balance the Budget and Eliminate the Federal Debt.” Read more reports from Scott Rasmussen — Click Here Now.
 
 
 
 

© Creators Syndicate Inc.

  Comment  |
   Contact  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

After Midterms, Time to Examine How We Vote

Friday, 21 Nov 2014 09:03 AM

The purpose of our political process is not to create a government that works. It is to create a society that works. . . .

Public Will Decide Fate of Obamacare

Friday, 14 Nov 2014 10:32 AM

In the wake of the midterm elections, many are now speculating about what will happen to President Obama's healthcare la . . .

Republican Gains Deep and Wide

Friday, 07 Nov 2014 10:38 AM

The bottom line is that Republicans now control all branches of state government in 23 states, Democrats in only seven.  . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved