Latest High Court Rulings Rein In Govt

Friday, 27 Jun 2014 01:11 PM

By Scott Rasmussen

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Earlier this week, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling against the president's right to get around Congress by making recess appointments. This is frustrating to President Barack Obama at the moment and will undoubtedly aggravate some future Republican president.
 
The New Yorker's Jeffrey Toobin wrote that this ruling will "make the government function less well, less justly, and less democratically than it does now." Disappointed, he concluded, "maybe the problem isn't the justices; it's the Constitution."
 
Other unanimous decisions protected cellphones from unwarranted searches by police and the free speech rights of protesters. Each had its detractors.
 
The problem, however, is not the Constitution. It's a political class that resents any limitation on its own power.
 
In fact, the difficulty these rulings will cause for government officials validates the vital importance of the Constitution.
 
Additionally, they highlight the wisdom and deep understanding of human nature possessed by the founders of our nation. Drawing upon centuries of pragmatic experience in self-governance, those who built the foundation of our government had a healthy understanding of political reality.
 
"If men were angels," James Madison wrote, "no government would be necessary." He added, "If angels were to govern men," there would be no problem. But there are no angels in politics. There are ambitious men and women.
 
As he drafted the Constitution, Madison understood that voting alone was never going to be enough for holding government accountable. That's why we have a careful system of checks and balances. Yes, that frustrates presidents and lesser politicians.

It's aggravating for those who want the government to rule without restriction. But it's not a flaw in the system; it's the way the process is supposed to work. As Madison put it, "Ambition must be made to counteract ambition."
 
If it were possible to hold government accountable simply by voting, those in office would never violate our rights. If we could trust politicians, we wouldn't need formal guarantees. But we can't.
 
That's why the amendments were approved guaranteeing us freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of press, protection from unfair search and seizure, and much more. These natural rights were the constitutional outline of what Thomas Jefferson referred to as the "Spirit of '76." We have the right to make our own choices so long as they are not a burden on society or violating someone else's rights.
 
That bedrock belief has frustrated many political leaders who think it's their job to tell us how to live. President Woodrow Wilson, for example, complained, "Some citizens of this country have never got beyond the Declaration of Independence." He described the American people as "selfish, ignorant, timid, stubborn, or foolish." No wonder he was troubled by the fact that "reformers" had to win public approval for their schemes.
 
Many in the political class — from both political parties — hold this view today. That's the reason we need a healthy system of checks and balances and the Bill of Rights.
 
Toobin is right that playing by the rules of the Constitution makes it harder for the government to run efficiently. That's OK. The goal of our political system is not to create a government that works but to create a society that works.
 
Scott Rasmussen is founder and president of the Rasmussen Media Group. He is the author of “Mad as Hell: How the Tea Party Movement Is Fundamentally Remaking Our Two-Party System,” “In Search of Self-Governance,” and “The People’s Money: How Voters Will Balance the Budget and Eliminate the Federal Debt.” Read more reports from Scott Rasmussen — Click Here Now.
 
 
 
 

© Creators Syndicate Inc.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Multiple Perspectives Complicate Ferguson

Friday, 22 Aug 2014 12:28 PM

From the moment the riots in Ferguson, Missouri, burst upon the national consciousness, people all across the nation hav . . .

Ferguson Riot Looks Like War

Friday, 15 Aug 2014 14:29 PM

The news from Ferguson, Mo., has brought back unpleasant memories from the long-ago riots in Asbury Park, N.J. It was th . . .

Nanny-State Mindset Leads to Police Brutality

Friday, 01 Aug 2014 10:51 AM

Once you accept the premise that so-called experts should decide what's best for the rest of us, the only question remai . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved