SPLC Short-Circuits Debate on Gay Marriage

Tuesday, 21 Aug 2012 02:09 PM

By Rich Lowry

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
The Southern Poverty Law Center is the nation's self-appointed monitor of "hate groups."

Too bad it can't tell the difference between people who hate blacks and people who support the traditional definition of marriage.

Tony-Perkins,-President-of-the-Family-Research-Council-Getty-Images.jpg
Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, speaks at a press conference following the shooting.
(Getty Images)
The SPLC's promiscuous labeling of organizations it disagrees with as "hate groups" came to the fore last week when someone tried to shoot up one of its targets.

You may not have heard that an armed assailant stormed the offices of the Family Research Council. That's because the assailant was a gay-rights activist and the assailed was an organization devoted to social-conservative causes.

If circumstances had been reversed, you'd know. If a gun-toting Family Research Council volunteer had burst into the headquarters of the Human Rights Campaign, "60 Minutes" would already have done its hard-hitting feature on right-wing terrorism.

The SPLC calls the Family Research Council a "hate group." This puts it in the same league as the True Invisible Empire Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, the Aryan Nation, the Supreme White Alliance, the Old Glory Skinheads and, of course, the American Nazi Party.

As they ask in kindergarten, which of these things isn't like all the others? The home page of the Aryan Nation features an appeal to "white Americans" to fight anti-white genocide in South Africa, along with a photo of Nelson Mandela standing next to "the Jew Joe Slovo."

The home page of the Family Research Council has a tab to learn more about "Marriage, Family, & Sexuality."

A man named Floyd Corkins allegedly showed up at the Family Research Council carrying a bag of Chick-fil-A sandwiches and a 9 mm and said, "I don't like your politics" before shooting an unarmed guard who managed to subdue him (the guard is recovering).

Corkins volunteers at a gay community center. According to an FBI affidavit, his parents "informed the FBI Special Agents that Corkins has strong opinions with respect to those he believes do not treat homosexuals in a fair manner."

Obviously.

The head of the Family Research Council, Tony Perkins, said the SPLC had given Corkins "a license to shoot." This goes too far. Nothing the SPLC does sanctions violence, and Corkins' alleged crime is his responsibility and his alone.

But the SPLC's designation of the Family Research Council is intolerant all the same, a bullying attempt to short-circuit free debate.

It's not as if the SPLC considers the Family Research Council mildly offensive, or barely hateful. Asked if someone addressing a Family Research Council meeting was as guilty as someone addressing an Aryan Nation rally, the SPLC's research director said "yes."

If Floyd Corkins took the SPLC's attitude toward the Family Research Council seriously, he would have been shocked to be confronted by an African-American security guard instead of some guy in a white hood about to run out to burn a cross in a gay person's front yard.

What the SPLC is doing is profoundly illiberal. The whole idea of a "hate group" is an organization that is so irrational and beyond the pale that it has no legitimacy. The SPLC brags about shutting down such groups, and rightly so.

You presumably don't have an argument with the White Patriot Party militia, unless you bring along a lead pipe. Putting the Family Research Council in the same category is a statement that it isn't worthy of a democratic society. Its views shouldn't be debated so much as shunned and marginalized.

This is the trend in the gay-marriage debate. The attempt to punish Chick-fil-A for the opinions of its founder and CEO, although an abject failure for now, will probably be the template of the future.

"Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views," William F. Buckley Jr., once said, "but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views." The SPLC and its allies on the left won't be satisfied until there are no other views on gay marriage.

Rich Lowry is the editor of National Review. He has written for The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, and a variety of other publications. Read more reports from Rich Lowry — Click Here Now.

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Obama's Unilateral Actions Show Disdain for Congress

Friday, 21 Nov 2014 16:55 PM

It doesn't take someone who used to teach constitutional law to know that Congress writes the law and the president exec . . .

Comet Mission Shouldn't Be Marred by Garish Shirt

Tuesday, 18 Nov 2014 10:57 AM

In discussing the mission on camera after the landing, Taylor wore a Hawaiian-style shirt depicting cartoonish, scantily . . .

Gruber Does Justice With Obamacare Views

Friday, 14 Nov 2014 13:45 PM

He has done us all a favor by affording us an unvarnished look into the progressive mind, . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved