Login or Register
Welcome , Settings |  Logout

Reid's Romney Tax Claim an 'Intellectual and Moral Mess'

Tuesday, 07 Aug 2012 10:11 AM

By Rich Lowry

Share:
More . . .
A    A   |
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Rich Lowry's perspective — There's something liberating about not caring about your reputation, your institution, or the truth.

By those standards, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is a blissfully free man.

The Nevada Democrat maintains that Mitt Romney didn't pay taxes for 10 years. Reid's charge is an intellectual and moral mess that makes the notorious question "When did you stop beating your wife?" seem rigorous by comparison.

Reid has a super-double-secret source he says is an investor in Bain who called to tell him, "Harry, he didn't pay any taxes for 10 years." Ordinarily, before repeating such a charge publicly, one would want a little proof, especially given that there's no more reason that a Bain investor would be familiar with Mitt Romney's tax returns than a Facebook investor would be familiar with Mark Zuckerberg's.

Harry Reid, though, is liberated from all such mundane evidentiary standards. Not to mention logic. His statements on Romney's tax returns lurch from outlandish premise to completely unconnected conclusion. Listening to Reid try to make an argument is like watching the late besotted journalist Hunter Thompson try to solve a quadratic equation while high on acid.

The only thing that holds together Reid's jumbled case is the vein of idiot malice that runs through the whole rancid thing.

"Now, do I know that that's true?" Reid mused to The Huffington Post about Romney not paying taxes. "Well, I'm not certain." With that bow to epistemological modesty, he proceeded in the next breath to indict Romney yet again: "But obviously he can't release those tax returns. How would it look?"

Reid took his case to the Senate floor, where he concluded a meandering oration, "Let him prove he has paid taxes because he has not." In the twisted world of Harry Reid, if something is not proven false, it must be true. He has all the cool analytic powers of the "birthers" and the "truthers."

"I don't think the burden should be on me," Reid told Nevada reporters about proving his charge. "The burden should be on him. He's the one I've alleged has not paid any taxes." Reid has the judicial instincts of someone who might have enjoyed the legendary witch trials of hundreds of years ago when the accused were thrown into the water — and considered innocent only if they sank.

Reid's alleged sources are ever-shifting. In The Huffington Post interview, it was one knowledgeable investor. On the Senate floor, it was a vague "the word is out." To Nevada reporters, it was "a number of people." Tomorrow it may be the queen of England, and the day after that H&R Block.

Democrats relish the Reid smear. Anything to keep the attention off the economy and on Romney's taxes or some other extraneous matter. Nancy Pelosi says "it is a fact" that someone told Reid that Romney didn't pay taxes. If she's right, all it proves is that Reid is indeed repeating hearsay.

Obama campaign spokesman Ben LaBolt, working for the re-election of the man who still professes to regret the pettiness of American politics, cheered the Nevadan on: "Sen. Reid rightfully pointed out that Gov. Romney has something to hide."

No, he made a specific, fantastical charge. Reid isn't a blogger, a cable host, or even a Senate backbencher. He's the highest elected Democrat in Congress. But his station doesn't mean anything to him; he's a hack at heart.

Reid's chief of staff, David Krone, shot back at the senator's critics as "cowards" and "henchmen." According to Krone, the Republicans' scorching reaction "shows you how scared they are that Harry Reid was telling the truth." Yet more evidence for the majority leader's files!

Republicans have condemned Reid's unsupported allegations as modern-day McCarthyism. Old Tail Gunner Joe was deflated at the Army-McCarthy hearings when he was confronted with the famous question, "Have you no sense of decency, sir?"

In the case of Harry Reid, it isn't even worth asking.

Rich Lowry is the editor of National Review. He has written for The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, and a variety of other publications. Read more reports from Rich Lowry — Click Here Now.













© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
More . . .
   Email Us   |
   Print   |
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax community.
Register to share your comments with the community. Already a member? Login
Note: Comments from readers do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of Newsmax Media. While we attempt to review comments, if you see an inappropriate comment you can block it by rolling over the comment, clicking the down arrow and selecting "Flag As Inappropriate."
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Top Stories
Around the Web
You May Also Like

The Benghazi Patsy

Friday, 10 May 2013 15:25 PM

Nakoula Basseley Nakoula deserves a place in American history. He is the first person in this country jailed for violati . . .

Obama's Red Line Exposes 'Fluff'

Tuesday, 07 May 2013 22:44 PM

Someone had to take the fall for President Barack Obama thoughtlessly drawing a "red line" threatening serious consequen . . .

Abortion's Euphemism Imperative

Friday, 03 May 2013 10:56 AM

President Barack Obama was proud to become the first sitting president to address Planned Parenthood the other day. But  . . .

 
 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved