The Charlotte host committee knew its audience at the Democratic National Convention. "Government," the narrator says in a video produced by the committee for the opening of the convention, "is the only thing we all belong to."
The Obama campaign quickly disavowed the video. But it captured all that was to come. The Charlotte Democrats are of, by and for government — especially when it is guaranteeing and facilitating access to abortion.
|The Charlotte convention celebrated President Obama's big-government agenda.
Democrats apparently held the convention in the Time Warner Cable Arena only because the local Planned Parenthood clinic down on Albemarle Road wasn't available.
God might have been left out of the party platform in a fit of absent-mindedness (and then acrimoniously restored), but government would never suffer such an indignity. It is the Alpha and Omega.
The maker of dreams, the giver of succor, the ultimate expression of community. When Democrats say "We're all in it together," what they mean is that the Office of Extramural Research, Education and Priority Populations in the Department of Health and Human Services needs twice as much funding.
For Clinton Democrats, the era of Big Government was over. For Obama Democrats, the era of Big Government is now and ever shall be, world without end. Amen.
Occasionally, anyone could nod along at the stories from the podium of old-fashioned American hardiness.
Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak's pioneer relatives crossed the Great Plains on a wagon train, and his widowed mother raised three kids. San Antonio Mayor Julian Castro's orphaned grandmother worked as maid and baby sitter to give his mom and him a chance. Michelle Obama's dad got up and went to work every day at the city water plant, despite the debilitating pain of multiple sclerosis.
These stirring evocations of family devotion, of community, of hard work in the face of adversity all turned, in the end, inevitably into apologia for government.
After talking of how the sacrifices of others paved the way for him, Castro asked: "But the question is, How do we multiply that success? The answer is President Barack Obama."
Oh, yes, where would we be without the Great Father?
"In tough times," Rybak said, "we come together."
To pass the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, evidently.
"Barack is thinking about folks like my dad," Michelle Obama said, "and his grandmother."
That's what the nearly $800 billion stimulus and the new $2 trillion health-care entitlement were all about, according to the first lady — though neither her dad nor his grandmother was a wastrel or a spendthrift.
The Democrats' favorite rhetorical trick is describing how we all depend on one another. We all have parents, teachers and neighbors. And then leveraging these connections to insist on increasing the size and scope of the least personal, least community-oriented institution in American life — the federal government.
Washington is not good at promoting aspiration. Democrats always talk of student loans, but the federal aid feeds the maw of an academic-industrial complex that increasingly delivers inferior educations at an ever-spiraling cost.
Neither is the federal government building great things. A posse of hard-hatted MSNBC anchors could scour the country looking for a grand, picturesque project funded by the Obama stimulus to stand in front of during a left-wing public-service announcement, and find nothing.
In reality, the American state is largely devoted to taking money from some people and giving it to others. Nicholas Eberstadt writes in an excerpt from his forthcoming book, "A Nation of Takers": "As a day-to-day operation, the U.S. government devotes more attention and resources to the public transfers of money, goods and services to individual citizens than to any other objective."
In other words, it is spreading the wealth around.
This is the model of government that is breaking down in Europe and wheezing here at home. But Democrats can no more criticize government than they could attack their mothers or fathers.
It is to what we all belong — and the more belonging the better.
Rich Lowry is the editor of National Review. He has written for The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, and a variety of other publications. Read more reports from Rich Lowry — Click Here Now.
© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.