Priebus: No Need for Campaign Contribution Caps

Image: Priebus: No Need for Campaign Contribution Caps

Wednesday, 09 Apr 2014 08:01 AM

By Melissa Clyne

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Now that the U.S. Supreme Court has struck down aggregate limits on campaign contributions, Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus has his eye on eliminating additional campaign finance restrictions, The Washington Post reports.

"I don’t think we should have caps at all," Priebus told conservative radio talk show host Hugh Hewitt on Tuesday, explaining his position that there should be no limit on how much money someone can contribute to either an individual or a political party.

Priebus told Hewitt he’d look for opportunities to bring those issues before the Supreme Court.

"Absolutely, I would,” he said. “And I would look to cases that allow us to raise soft money, and I would look to cases that allow us to raise money for the conventions, but disclose it all. That's kind of where I'm at personally."

In McCutcheon v. Federal Elections Commission, Republican businessman Shaun McCutcheon – joined by the RNC – argued that it’s unconstitutional to cap the total amount a donor can give to federal candidates and political party committees throughout the course of a two-year election cycle. The court left in place individual contribution limits – $2,600 per election per candidate and $32,400 per party per committee.

While Priebus said he theoretically supports disclosure laws requiring the source of political contributions be identified, in reality he has mixed feelings about it.

“I mean, you want to be for disclosure,” he explained. “But when you start to see some of the cases out there where people are targeted, and businesses are targeted and picketed and threatened for political contributions, then now you’re suppressing free speech through disclosure. So I mean, even things that I want to agree with are getting to be very difficult.”

Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich resigned last week after his opposition to gay marriage – in the form of a contribution to a 2008 California initiative to outlaw it – became public.

Related Stories:

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Poll Watchers on Both Sides Keeping Close Eye on Voter ID Laws

Saturday, 25 Oct 2014 16:41 PM

Poll watchers for both liberal and conservative groups will be battling over voter ID laws on Election Day, with Democra . . .

NJ Gov. Christie Back Again in Iowa

Saturday, 25 Oct 2014 16:12 PM

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie returned to Iowa on Saturday to headline one of the biggest events on the state's politic . . .

Mississippi Supreme Court Rejects McDaniel Primary Challenge

Saturday, 25 Oct 2014 12:09 PM

Mississippi Tea Party candidate Chris McDaniel lost his attempt to revisit a losing primary challenge against U.S. Senat . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved