Priebus: No Need for Campaign Contribution Caps

Image: Priebus: No Need for Campaign Contribution Caps

Wednesday, 09 Apr 2014 08:01 AM

By Melissa Clyne

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
Now that the U.S. Supreme Court has struck down aggregate limits on campaign contributions, Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus has his eye on eliminating additional campaign finance restrictions, The Washington Post reports.

"I don’t think we should have caps at all," Priebus told conservative radio talk show host Hugh Hewitt on Tuesday, explaining his position that there should be no limit on how much money someone can contribute to either an individual or a political party.

Priebus told Hewitt he’d look for opportunities to bring those issues before the Supreme Court.

"Absolutely, I would,” he said. “And I would look to cases that allow us to raise soft money, and I would look to cases that allow us to raise money for the conventions, but disclose it all. That's kind of where I'm at personally."

In McCutcheon v. Federal Elections Commission, Republican businessman Shaun McCutcheon – joined by the RNC – argued that it’s unconstitutional to cap the total amount a donor can give to federal candidates and political party committees throughout the course of a two-year election cycle. The court left in place individual contribution limits – $2,600 per election per candidate and $32,400 per party per committee.

While Priebus said he theoretically supports disclosure laws requiring the source of political contributions be identified, in reality he has mixed feelings about it.

“I mean, you want to be for disclosure,” he explained. “But when you start to see some of the cases out there where people are targeted, and businesses are targeted and picketed and threatened for political contributions, then now you’re suppressing free speech through disclosure. So I mean, even things that I want to agree with are getting to be very difficult.”

Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich resigned last week after his opposition to gay marriage – in the form of a contribution to a 2008 California initiative to outlaw it – became public.

Related Stories:

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Ramesh Ponnuru: GOP's Lack of Defining Agenda May Be Mistake

Tuesday, 02 Sep 2014 15:14 PM

With elections looming in November, Republicans are counting on President Barack Obama's unpopularity to deliver them co . . .

Congressional Candidates Use Guns to Aim Ad Messages

Tuesday, 02 Sep 2014 13:35 PM

A bevy of pistol-packing politicos are hoping to blast their way into office this year, posting campaign ads featuring t . . .

Poll: Ky. Voters Want Rand Paul to Choose - Senate or Presidency

Tuesday, 02 Sep 2014 12:49 PM

In Kentucky, voters believe Sen. Rand Paul needs to make a choice: re-election to the Senate or a bigger run for the pre . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved