Boehner: 'As Long As I'm Here, No Earmarks'

Image: Boehner: 'As Long As I'm Here, No Earmarks'

Monday, 12 May 2014 06:11 PM

By Jason Devaney

  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
The effort to bring earmarks back to the U.S. Capitol is in full swing, with politicians from both parties fighting for their return. But House Speaker John Boehner said he will continue to keep them out of his chamber.

"I've been here for 24 years and I've never, ever once asked for an earmark or got one. Not once. I started this effort in 2006 to get rid of earmarks. We are not going back to the nonsense that went on before," the Ohio Republican told Fox Business, as reported by Politico.

Last week, Senate Republicans sparred over earmarks during a lunch, which included a 90-minute debate on the topic. According to Politico, Sens. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., and Mark Udall, D-Colo., are gathering signatures on a petition to keep the earmark ban in place. They have about 20 signers so far.

"There’s always a movement [to bring back earmarks]. As long as I’m here, no earmarks," Boehner, who outlawed earmarks when he became speaker in 2011, told Fox Business. President Obama agreed with the ban.

Last week, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said the return of earmarks — the local projects lawmakers assign to bills in Congress — could help ease the gridlock in Washington.

"I have been a fan of earmarks since I got here the first day," Reid said. "It is wrong to have bureaucrats downtown make decisions in Nevada that I can make better than they can make. I don't run away at all. This is something that's been going on for centuries in our country. And it has worked quite well."

Earlier this month, Coburn wrote an opinion piece for the Wall Street Journal in which he urged his colleagues in Washington not to erase the ban on earmarks. He refers to proponents of earmarks as "porkers," in reference to pork barrel politics.

"The porkers' core argument — that Congress needs earmarks to pass good bills that wouldn't pass otherwise — is ludicrous," Coburn writes. "Pork crowds out higher priority needs. On transportation bills, for instance, the Transportation Department's Inspector General told us in 2007 that the presence of earmarks meant members' pet projects were funded ahead of more important projects such as repairing structurally deficient bridges, which now number 63,000 or 10 percent of our nation's bridges. There is a higher chance the bridge you cross today on your way to work could collapse thanks in part to Congress' legacy of perverse priorities."

Coburn also called earmarks "a gateway drug to higher spending."

Related Stories:

© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Zip Code:
Privacy: We never share your email.
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
Top Stories
You May Also Like

Poll: Support Tilting to McConnell in Tight Ky Senate Race

Tuesday, 21 Oct 2014 08:28 AM

With just two weeks until Election Day, Kentucky Sen. Mitch McConnell has regained a slim 1-point lead over his Democrat . . .

Bill Clinton to Campaign for Mary Burke in Wisconsin

Tuesday, 21 Oct 2014 07:55 AM

Former president Bill Clinton who twice carried the state will be in Wisconsin to campaign for Democratic gubernatorial  . . .

Scott Brown: Sen. Shaheen Will Support Obama's Amnesty Plan

Tuesday, 21 Oct 2014 07:02 AM

New Hampshire Republican senate candidate Scott Brown attacked Democratic incumbent Sen. Jeanne Shaheen for publicly dis . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved