Tags: Walker | court | constitutional | union

Scott Walker in Court Battle to Keep Union Reforms

Monday, 11 Nov 2013 07:18 PM

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker’s 2011 legislation curbing the collective-bargaining rights of most public employees is constitutional, his attorney general told the state supreme court in a test of whether it infringes rights to free association and free speech.

Seven justices in Madison were hearing arguments Monday on the state’s bid to reverse a trial court judge’s decision last year that parts of the measure known as Act 10 unduly burden union members’ rights.

"We do not have a constitutional violation here," Wisconsin Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen told the court, arguing that collective bargaining isn’t a fundamental right.

Asked by Justice Ann Walsh Bradley if the parties' differing views of the right to free association was tantamount to two ships passing, Van Hollen responded, "I don’t believe we are two ships passing. We are two ships that collided. The state has a bigger ship and we will win."

The court hasn’t yet heard from the law's challengers, who were scheduled to follow the state's presentation.

Advocated by Walker, a first-term Republican, the legislation requires annual recertification votes for union representation and made the payment of union dues voluntary. Some groups of public safety officers are exempt from its strictures.

Opposition to Act 10 drew protests outside the state's Capitol and triggered a recall election last year in which Walker prevailed over Democratic challenger Tom Barrett.

A U.S. appeals court in Chicago upheld the measure in its entirety in a Jan. 18 ruling in a separate case. In a 2-1 vote, that panel reversed a lower-court decision that the annual recertification provision was invalid, as was the prohibition of voluntary deduction of union dues from the paychecks of general employees only.

Opponents of the measure, counting the opposing federal appeals court vote, and the state and federal trial court rulings invalidating parts of the measure, told Wisconsin's top court justices that three of the five judges who have looked at the law have found it constitutionally defective.

"Those outcomes show that this case presents close constitutional questions that need careful consideration," attorneys for the challengers said in their appellate brief.

"Plaintiffs do not contend that municipal employees have a constitutional right to force their employers to negotiate collectively with them," the plaintiffs’ lawyers said. "Rather, they claim a constitutional right to self-organization and to associate with a union, including for collective-bargaining purposes."

Responding to a question from Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson, Van Hollen told the judges that nothing in Act 10 prevents an individual employee from seeking a raise directly from an employer.

"The employer has the prerogative to grant the request, to listen to the employee or to say no," the attorney general said, adding the law allows employers to reward those workers more deserving.

Trial court Judge Juan Colas in Madison ruled last year that parts of the legislation unduly burdened affected workers' constitutional rights to free speech and free association.

A three-judge panel of Wisconsin’s intermediate-level Court of Appeals in April asked the state's highest court to decide the issue after the Walker administration appealed the Colas decision.

"It’s hard to imagine a dispute with greater statewide effect or greater need for a final resolution by the Supreme Court," the appellate judges said in their 24-page request.

The high court in June said it would take the case.

© Copyright 2015 Bloomberg News. All rights reserved.

1Like our page

Newsmax, Moneynews, Newsmax Health, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, and Newsmax World are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved