Tags: Obama | trade | wage | healthcare

How to Craft a Winning GOP Strategy for Obama's War on Inequality

Monday, 27 Jan 2014 07:12 AM

By Peter Morici Twitter @pmorici1

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
President Obama, dogged by the bungled rollout of the Affordable Care Act and a slow economic recovery, is declaring war on inequality. An age-old problem made worse by his policies, he offers more opiates — like raising the minimum wage — that fail to address the root causes of vanishing opportunities and falling incomes for most Americans.

Market capitalism has proven a superior system to anything Old World socialists and American liberals can contrive. To the misfortune of utopians seeking both equality and prosperity, the system rewards intelligence and hard work and requires some inequality to accomplish prosperity.

Editor’s Note: 18.79% Annual Returns . . . for Life?

Globalization, promoted through free trade agreements by presidents since Kennedy, has opened vast markets and increased the incomes of the most talented and industrious Americans, while subjecting more ordinary citizens to more intense competition from workers in Asia and elsewhere.

Sadly, foreign markets for what many Americans make remain largely closed. GM boasts some of the best-selling cars in China, but high tariffs and regulations keep out U.S.-made vehicles. That denies ordinary workers good-paying jobs.

In tandem, domestic policies encourage the monopolization of markets, provide big paydays for top executives and star performers, and impose higher prices and lower living standards on ordinary Americans.

Dodd-Frank has not stopped reckless risk taking and big paydays on Wall Street, but its regulatory costs have compelled many smaller banks to sell out to big banks. Having a tighter grip on markets, larger banks charge higher fees, pay less interest on savings and reward top executives.

The Federal Communications Commission does not classify cable television providers as utilities and permit regulation of their rates. Monthly fees rise with the rhythmic certainty of the onset of winter and permit huge payouts to the NFL. That makes Peyton Manning richer and subscribers poorer, regardless of whether or not they watch football.

Obamacare and the broader morass of federal and state healthcare regulations have encouraged the consolidation of hospitals around many major cities, and reduced the number of health insurance companies operating in regional markets. Less competition increases salaries for hospital administrators, insurance company executives and some medical specialties.

Overall, Americans pay 50 percent more for healthcare than do the Germans and the Dutch, who also have private providers and high quality care, and Americans compete less effectively in world markets and earn lower wages for that difference.

As the president suggests, raising the minimum wage would help many poor Americans, but it would also destroy jobs. A better strategy would be to junk the wage floor altogether and combine all federal income support programs — the earned income tax credit, food stamps, Medicaid, Obamacare subsidies for health insurance premiums and the like — into something more coherent like a family allowance for each child. That would level incomes a bit and eliminate a lot of bureaucracy that is slowing businesses, weighing down growth and keeping most Americans from earning bigger paychecks.

However, for such pro-market approaches to work, Republicans would have to accept that in some places markets need help to be effective and fair.

If they want free trade, then they must support agreements that give American workers a better deal. To junk Obamacare, they must come up with a regulatory framework that actually lowers prices and costs. And if we are to rely more on markets and less on regulation to discipline the banks, then it is time to break up the big banks to foster genuine competition.

Obama is surely right about one thing. If Republicans want to change things, then they have to win more elections. That will require more pragmatism and less ideology. Opposing the president, no matter how wrong-headed some of his policies may be, is simply not enough.

Editor’s Note: 18.79% Annual Returns . . . for Life?

© 2014 Moneynews. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Stocks Could Rise Another 25% Before Bull Market Hits Wall

Wednesday, 30 Jul 2014 09:30 AM

Stocks may be near record levels but the bull market is not done. Digital technologies permit businesses to use investor . . .

The Real Unemployment Rate Is at Least 18%

Tuesday, 29 Jul 2014 06:59 AM

The jobless rate may be down from its recession peak of 10 percent, but much of this results from adults, discouraged by . . .

Paul Ryan's Entitlement Reforms Would Promote Work

Thursday, 24 Jul 2014 09:24 AM

Poverty is as endemic today as it was when President Johnson inaugurated the War on Poverty, and Paul Ryan is offering s . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved