Obama's Minimum-Wage Ploy Hurts the Working Poor

Tuesday, 04 Feb 2014 07:27 AM

By Peter Morici Twitter @pmorici1

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
  Copy Shortlink
President Barack Obama put his political fortunes above the least among us by badgering Republicans in Congress to raise the minimum wage to $10.10 an hour.

In 1938, Congress first established the federal minimum and has periodically raised it to accommodate inflation. Currently at $7.25 per hour, it appears woefully inadequate to fair-minded Americans, and the president feeds this sentiment by carping that it’s worth 20 percent less than when Harry Truman was president.

What Obama doesn’t tell voters is the minimum is often paid to teenagers bagging groceries and college students on work-study jobs that are really masked financial aid.

Editor’s Note: 18.79% Annual Returns . . . for Life?

Moreover, adults earning the lowest wages have sources of income not enjoyed in Truman’s days — an earned income-tax credit, food stamps and Medicaid. And employers of domestic workers now fund Social Security pensions and more unemployment insurance — an additional 8 percent in compensation generally not offered in Truman’s time.

Liberal papers and cable networks are fond to roll out single mothers, scripted by union supported community activists and organizers, who recount they cannot afford to eat earning so little at McDonald's.

Yet, they are awfully energetic and hardly ever appear malnourished, and correspondents never get around to asking how they use their food stamps or about support received from their children’s father.

Except for apologists for farmers that don’t farm and economists hanging off the left edge of reality, economists don’t like price-fixing — whether perpetrated by unscrupulous businesses or politicians buying votes.

After all, agricultural supports raises what struggling mothers must pay for milk, clothing and other essentials for their families. The minimum wage makes hiring workers more expensive, eliminates jobs at the bottom of the ladder, and generally slows growth and raises unemployment.

Economic studies show that periodically raising the minimum wage to keep pace with inflation creates little additional harm — after all that is not much different than the raises most other Americans receive as prices rise. However, what Obama is proposing is a wholly different matter.

Congress last adjusted the federal standard in 2009. Since, consumer prices are up 9 percent, but the president is proposing a 39 percent jump. Along with higher taxes and health insurance costs — thanks to Obamacare — most businesses will be compelled to substitute more technology for workers.

Drug stores, grocers and McDonald's, for example, can make greater use of computerized check-out and order-taking — and even impose premium prices on patrons insisting on accessing clerks directly.

McDonald's is already challenged by an inability to raise prices because working class Americans can’t afford to pay another dollar for lunch.

Across the board, small value-priced restaurants and hotels will do less business or close, and others in the planning will never open. Ask the folks in the lodging business in Sea-Tac, Washington, where the city-council has jumped the local minimum beyond what the market can reasonably bear.

Obama understands Republicans in Congress, who care about creating jobs and growth, cannot happily approve a huge increase to $10.10. Hence, he gets to run around the country fashioning Democratic candidates in the fall elections as champions of justice, and the GOP leaders as throwbacks from the Age of Dickens.

To this economist — like it or not — a minimum wage is a fact of life. Raising it to keep pace with inflation and a bit more to $8.25 won’t much affect employment.

Giving the president a political victory by jumping it further will only serve to deny hundreds of thousands of working poor decent jobs.

In the meantime, his politically motivated campaign blocks a reasonable adjustment and keeps those earning the least from getting a raise.

Editor’s Note: 18.79% Annual Returns . . . for Life?

© 2014 Moneynews. All rights reserved.

Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
  Copy Shortlink
Around the Web
Join the Newsmax Community
Please review Community Guidelines before posting a comment.
>> Register to share your comments with the community.
>> Login if you are already a member.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Email:
Retype Email:
Country
Zip Code:
 
Hot Topics
Follow Newsmax
Like us
on Facebook
Follow us
on Twitter
Add us
on Google Plus
Around the Web
You May Also Like

Paul Ryan's Entitlement Reforms Would Promote Work

Thursday, 24 Jul 2014 09:24 AM

Poverty is as endemic today as it was when President Johnson inaugurated the War on Poverty, and Paul Ryan is offering s . . .

Malaysian Jet Massacre Ukraine Crisis Spotlight US, European Weakness

Tuesday, 22 Jul 2014 07:28 AM

The downing of Malaysia Flight 17 casts new light on just how inept and decadent the United States and Europe have becom . . .

Yellen's Denials About Inflation Will Curb Fed's Independence

Friday, 18 Jul 2014 08:01 AM

If Yellen can't run the Fed responsibly and at least acknowledge the inflation data on her desk, Congress will leash mon . . .

Most Commented

Newsmax, Moneynews, and Independent. American. are registered trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc. Newsmax TV, NewsmaxWorld, NewsmaxHealth, are trademarks of Newsmax Media, Inc.

 
NEWSMAX.COM
America's News Page
©  Newsmax Media, Inc.
All Rights Reserved